Nothing New
in [Freeware]
|
From: »Q« on 18 Apr 2010 16:53 In <news:Xns9D5E95C4F53C4bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)69.16.185.250>, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in > news:831565Fl89U1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > Bear Bottoms wrote: > >> > >> Linux is still too rough around the edges. Case closed. I don't > >> want to tinker with an operating system. I want to use it > >> seamlessly. > > > > Which is your prerogative. But that is far different from lying > > about it. > > There are no lies...but for your assumptions...which you make > statements as fact...wrong thus lies. That's gibberish, but it seems to indicate that you're still unwilling to admit your lies. One of the many lies you told was that Intel's 3945 wireless chipset isn't fully supported; you haven't retracted that lie despite it having been thoroughly debunked in this thread. The only stuff you've said that's not a lie are your opinions that Linux is "rough around the edges". Since your opinions are based on your own lies and fantasies, it's tough to take them seriously.
From: Anonymous on 18 Apr 2010 17:00 Bear Bottoms wrote: > Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions(a)gmail.com> wrote in > news:831565Fl89U1(a)mid.individual.net: > >> Bear Bottoms wrote: >>> >>> Linux is still too rough around the edges. Case closed. I don't want >>> to tinker with an operating system. I want to use it seamlessly. >> >> Which is your prerogative. But that is far different from lying about >> it. >> >> > There are no lies...but for your assumptions...which you make statements > as fact...wrong thus lies. You ARE lying when you say that Ubuntu won't work with your wireless adapter. It does, and we've seen irrefutable evidence to prove that it does.
From: Dan Goodman on 18 Apr 2010 17:20 Bear Bottoms wrote: > Anonymous <nobody(a)remailer.paranoici.org> wrote in > news:2febe08be7760430832a0a35a5844099(a)remailer.paranoici.org: > > > shrug > > Linux is still too rough around the edges. Case closed. I don't want > to tinker with an operating system. I want to use it seamlessly. It takes a few thousand years to get the bugs out of anything. By my standards, every available operating system is still rough around the edges. -- Dan Goodman "I have always depended on the kindness of stranglers" A Streetcar Named Expire http://dsgood.dreamwidth.com http://dsgood.livejournal.com http://dsgood.insanejournal.com
From: Mark Warner on 18 Apr 2010 17:37 Bear Bottoms wrote: > <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote: >> >> One of the many lies you told was that Intel's 3945 wireless chipset >> isn't fully supported; you haven't retracted that lie despite it >> having been thoroughly debunked in this thread. > > It was a quote dude. LOL. And that is yet another lie. LOL. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ....lose .inhibitions when replying
From: Mark Warner on 18 Apr 2010 17:51
Bear Bottoms wrote: > > Granted, there is very little software/programs without bugs. Having to > dig through forums, or learn commands for CLI to get something to happen > is a bit ancient...Linux is a bit too rough around the edges for my > tastes. I mean sheesh, that went out with Win 3.1. And this, my friends, proves once again that Bear has been lying all along about his experience with Linux. You see, one *does* *not* need to even open the terminal to use consumer oriented desktop Linux distros like Ubuntu. If he had any experience whatsoever, he would know that to be the case. So he either has a) no experience whatsoever, or b) has some experience, but choses to spread FUD instead. I'll go with A for a thousand, Alex. This has been a productive weekend. My work here is done. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ....lose .inhibitions when replying |