Obsticales to scientific progress
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Whats happening in Ceramics Field?
Next: Relativity Researcher: Increase Your Research Productivity with the Leading Web 2.0 Research Portal
From: Igor on 19 Dec 2009 10:38 On Dec 18, 1:36 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > (c^2) = (c in circular motion) = (c x 2pi) with angular momentum of (h/ > 2pi), and unifies special general relativity with quantum theory and > also = (G) as (c^2) is the ultimate (L/T^2) just as (G = L/T^2). Thus > (c^2 = h/2pi = G). They are all energy in circular motion with rest > mass at the quantum level. It is realy just that simple and is > probably why it was missed using such complex mathematics which seems > to have let this equality slip right through it. The Swartzchild > radius of (r=Gm/c^2), which is said to be the radius below which mass > becomes a black hole according to General Relativity and the reduced > Compton wavelength (wavelength/2pi) below which if a particle is > squarshed more particles will be created according to quantum theory > are equal here at the frequency/wavelength of (c^2). They are the > radius of the electron as a circle and diameter of elestron as a > spherical particle which is why squashing it below this has said > effects. > > It doesn't matter if you agree or not it is still the case and will be > revealed in time > Let me guess. All of this was revealed to you by the Cheshire Cat and the White Rabbit after you stepped through the looking glass?
From: Y.Porat on 19 Dec 2009 11:44 On Dec 19, 5:35 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Dec 18, 12:35 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 14, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> Obsticals to progress in science, Physics in particular. > > > > 1) Too many people in key positions that control desinemation of > > > information, are more interested in who is right, and gets subjective > > > credit for it, than what is more objectively right, and progresses > > > science. Thank goodness for the internet and Google sci physics. > > > ---------------------- > > > absolutly right !!you forgot to add another > > peoblem: > > science became a BUSINESS !! > > Sounds like you're confusing process and product, Borat. ------------------ what is your income from science parroting?? (and mumbling ??) iow from what are you doing your living ??..... ie what is your day job as well ?? Y.P ---------------------------
From: Aleph on 19 Dec 2009 14:03 In article <2967c3cb-a8a7-4551-b33d- 7cb3d709b41d(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:18:17 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> imparted these words of wisdom: > > > ---------------- > mathematics cannot make pioneering science > it can be only an aiding tool > (after that new*physics* ideas were introduced by physics thinkers > not paper thinkers !!) > Are you some kind of retard? -- Aleph This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails to this account will be ignored.
From: Aleph on 19 Dec 2009 14:05 In article <64bda67c-fbdd-4e36-b551-0ea26a61c580 @a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:44:33 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> imparted these words of wisdom: > > ------------------ > what is your income from science parroting?? > (and mumbling ??) > iow > from what are you doing your living ??..... > ie > what is your day job as well ?? What a retort! You were wrong, you were called on it and rather than defend your nonsense or say sorry, you come up with that! Fight the power Poohrat, fight the power. -- Aleph This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails to this account will be ignored.
From: Inertial on 20 Dec 2009 01:27
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:cd10333f-ae80-4da1-85ae-c15a7e4b8cbc(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> 1) Planck discovered - E=hf originally stated E=hv, for photons >> --------------------------- > just a little example of wrong paradigm: > > E=hv ..... Yeup > and here you have the profe that > photon energy has mass !!! No .. it does show the energy of a photon is completely proportional to the frequency of light(and so frame dependent). Which would imply that there is no amount of the energy that come from a non-zero mass. Also, a non-zero mass cannot be accelerated to a speed of c with a finit amount of energy. This has been explained to you countless times, and you still persist with your lies. > ------------------ >> 2) Einstein discovered - E=mc^2 for >electrons/matter > > enery= matter and mass > actually - mass in motion as in macrocosm !! E = mc^2 is the rest energy of some mass (ie when it is NOT in motion). So you claim that energy is only mass in motion is flawed. > no mass -- no real physics !!! There is more to physics than just mass. |