Obsticales to scientific progress
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Whats happening in Ceramics Field?
Next: Relativity Researcher: Increase Your Research Productivity with the Leading Web 2.0 Research Portal
From: Y.Porat on 18 Dec 2009 12:35 On Dec 14, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Obsticals to progress in science, Physics in particular. > > 1) Too many people in key positions that control desinemation of > information, are more interested in who is right, and gets subjective > credit for it, than what is more objectively right, and progresses > science. Thank goodness for the internet and Google sci physics. > ---------------------- absolutly right !!you forgot to add another peoblem: science became a BUSINESS !! a source of living nmo matter whatit is just wait and see all the parasite gangsters parrots comming on you because you are threatening their business!! ---------------- > 2) Basing too much on established scientific axions, that have proven > themselfs in past, but are not nessesarily true for all cases, instead > of going to the very foundation of science, which is looking at > something as objective and free of preconcieved notions, as possible. > This means transending the pre-established axioms such as > "The speed of light is constant and the highest possible speed", may be constant maybenot but there are much more serious fucks: like aprticles without mass (Higgs Bosons) 3 quarks that their mass is 10percent of the mass of the proton and therest is GLUEONS .. (:-) exactly an electron for any proton in a heavy Atoms '''the HUP prevents us from deciding the inner structure of the nuc ''' photons without mass !! etc etc current physics was taken over by fucken mathematician that have not the slightest physics touch so they started loosing the ground of reality and soaring above solid ground etc etc ---------------- > frequency along the electromagnetic spectrum is infinite, ect. > > 3) Desire to maintain "Uncertainty Priciples", mystery, instead of > resolving it. > > 4) Physisist religious adoration for certain ideas and there authors religion thats the correct definition including the gangster priests ! > resulting in religious and artistic atatchments. The attatchment is so > great, that some look at it as blasphemous and or defiling ones > religion or artwork. > > 5) Non-recognition of natural ability, and too much relyment on title, > repitation, and degree instead of letting evidence speak for itself ------------- right ! that is part of the gang system! ----------- > being its own credentials, right !! 9a closed gild of interesants when we can show an analogy between the > natural ability of artist, is parrallel to the natural ability of > science. It is well known that artist without formal training, can > sometimes achieve much grester results, than their rigorously educated > counterparts. This implies that natural ability, carries just as much > or more, wieght as rigorious training. > > If we address these points head on, a new wave of creativity and > discovery will be released. > > Conrad J Countess well said Conrad jsut dont detere from saing it again and again untle THE HIGGS bOSONS WILL BE FOUND WITH THE PROBABILITY OF ONE TO 100 BILLION (:-) and the Higgs is just one example we have the W Boson the Z Boson etc etc and the crooks are selling it to the suckers to swallow it without blinking an eye !!! crooks and suckers was all along history a winning game !!! 2 we cant say that** all* current science is wrong!! but it is much worse than crooks(and suckers ) are ready to admit ! ATB Y.Porat ----------------------------
From: cjcountess on 18 Dec 2009 13:36 (c^2) = (c in circular motion) = (c x 2pi) with angular momentum of (h/ 2pi), and unifies special general relativity with quantum theory and also = (G) as (c^2) is the ultimate (L/T^2) just as (G = L/T^2). Thus (c^2 = h/2pi = G). They are all energy in circular motion with rest mass at the quantum level. It is realy just that simple and is probably why it was missed using such complex mathematics which seems to have let this equality slip right through it. The Swartzchild radius of (r=Gm/c^2), which is said to be the radius below which mass becomes a black hole according to General Relativity and the reduced Compton wavelength (wavelength/2pi) below which if a particle is squarshed more particles will be created according to quantum theory are equal here at the frequency/wavelength of (c^2). They are the radius of the electron as a circle and diameter of elestron as a spherical particle which is why squashing it below this has said effects. It doesn't matter if you agree or not it is still the case and will be revealed in time Conrad J Countess
From: Y.Porat on 18 Dec 2009 14:14 On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > 1) Planck discovered - E=hf originally stated E=hv, for photons > --------------------------- just a little example of wrong paradigm: E=hv ..... and here you have the profe that photon energy has mass !!! ------------------ > 2) Einstein discovered - E=mc^2 for >electrons/matter enery= matter and mass actually - mass in motion as in macrocosm !! no mass -- no real physics !!! Y.P ----------------------------
From: eric gisse on 18 Dec 2009 15:18 Y.Porat wrote: > On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> 1) Planck discovered - E=hf originally stated E=hv, for photons >> --------------------------- > just a little example of wrong paradigm: > > E=hv ..... > and here you have the profe that > photon energy has mass !!! And thus Porat enters 2010 by failing the same introductory physics course again for the thousandth straight year. Dimensions do not dictate physics, chuckles. > > > ------------------ >> 2) Einstein discovered - E=mc^2 for >electrons/matter > > enery= matter and mass > actually - mass in motion as in macrocosm !! > no mass -- no real physics !!! > > Y.P > ----------------------------
From: Igor on 19 Dec 2009 10:35
On Dec 18, 12:35 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 14, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> Obsticals to progress in science, Physics in particular. > > > 1) Too many people in key positions that control desinemation of > > information, are more interested in who is right, and gets subjective > > credit for it, than what is more objectively right, and progresses > > science. Thank goodness for the internet and Google sci physics. > > ---------------------- > > absolutly right !!you forgot to add another > peoblem: > science became a BUSINESS !! Sounds like you're confusing process and product, Borat. |