Obsticales to scientific progress
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Whats happening in Ceramics Field?
Next: Relativity Researcher: Increase Your Research Productivity with the Leading Web 2.0 Research Portal
From: Androcles on 21 Dec 2009 20:27 <vjp2.at(a)at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com> wrote in message news:hgp6st$5qo$6(a)reader1.panix.com... > Science, religion and economics suffer when they depend on politicians. > Okay... > I was reading about St Anthony, the first monk. > Never heard of him. What's a "saint"? > He had power over > politicians because he had no part of their world. Once they get their > hook, their subisdy, into you, you are finished. > Most of what we call religious extremism or oppresion came about that way. Did it really? Amazing. > Read Paul Johnson's Modern TImes on EInstein. Who is Paul Johnson and what does he know that I don't? > Newton and Darwin have also > been abused. See Hofstadter's Social Darwinism book. Who is Hofstadter and what does he know that I don't?
From: Igor on 22 Dec 2009 13:03 On Dec 21, 4:22 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 20, 5:23 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 19, 11:44 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 19, 5:35 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 18, 12:35 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 14, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> Obsticals to progress in science, Physics in particular. > > > > > > > 1) Too many people in key positions that control desinemation of > > > > > > information, are more interested in who is right, and gets subjective > > > > > > credit for it, than what is more objectively right, and progresses > > > > > > science. Thank goodness for the internet and Google sci physics.. > > > > > > ---------------------- > > > > > > absolutly right !!you forgot to add another > > > > > peoblem: > > > > > science became a BUSINESS !! > > > > > Sounds like you're confusing process and product, Borat. > > > > ------------------ > > > what is your income from science parroting?? > > > (and mumbling ??) > > > iow > > > from what are you doing your living ??..... > > > ie > > > what is your day job as well ?? > > > You forgot to ask whether I've stopped beating my wife, Borat. > > ------------------- > who knows ?? (:-) > considering your honesty and integrity > (of a Bolshevik ) > it might well be (:-) > > there is another possibility > ie > that *she is beating you* (:-) > therefore you come here to spill your frustration here ??? (:-) > > if you believe in Higgs Bosons > anything can be believed .....(:-) > Nobody believes in the Higgs Boson, dumbass. It's a prediction based on a scientific hypothesis. They apparently still have yet to teach scientific method to your elementary school class. Let us know when you graduate from the sixth grade. Then you'll be as smart as Jethro Bodine. But alas, not yet.
From: Igor on 22 Dec 2009 13:05 On Dec 21, 8:20 pm, vjp2...(a)at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote: > Science, religion and economics suffer when they depend on politicians. > > I was reading about St Anthony, the first monk. He had power over > politicians because he had no part of their world. Once they get their > hook, their subisdy, into you, you are finished. > > Most of what we call religious extremism or oppresion came about that way.. > > Read Paul Johnson's Modern TImes on EInstein. Newton and Darwin have also > been abused. See Hofstadter's Social Darwinism book. > > - = - > Vasos Panagiotopoulos, Columbia'81+, Reagan, Mozart, Pindus, BioStrategist > http://www.panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm http://www.facebook.com/vasjpan2 > <P ALIGN="CENTER"> <IMG SRC="http://www.panix.com/~vjp2/vjbiz.jpg"></P> > ---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed..}--- > [Homeland Security means private firearms not lazy obstructive guards] > [Urb sprawl confounds terror] [Phooey on GUI: Windows for subprime Bimbos] Congratulations for taking this thread, making a quick right turn, and driving it into brick wall.
From: Autymn D. C. on 22 Dec 2009 13:24 On Dec 19, 10:27 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:cd10333f-ae80-4da1-85ae-c15a7e4b8cbc(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> 1) Planck discovered - E=hf originally stated E=hv, for photons > >> --------------------------- > > just a little example of wrong paradigm: > > > E=hv ..... > > Yeup > > > and here you have the profe that > > photon energy has mass !!! > > No .. it does show the energy of a photon is completely proportional to the > frequency of light(and so frame dependent). Which would imply that there is > no amount of the energy that come from a non-zero mass. Also, a non-zero > mass cannot be accelerated to a speed of c with a finit amount of energy. Cough, I already proved a mass can reach celerity within one lambda. -Aut
From: Autymn D. C. on 22 Dec 2009 13:55
On Dec 18, 9:35 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 14, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> Obsticals to progress in science, Physics in particular. > > 2) Basing too much on established scientific axions, that have proven > > themselfs in past, but are not nessesarily true for all cases, instead > > of going to the very foundation of science, which is looking at > > something as objective and free of preconcieved notions, as possible. > > This means transending the pre-established axioms such as > > "The speed of light is constant and the highest possible speed", > > may be constant maybenot Of course not: Huygens, Chèrèncov. > but there are much more serious fucks: > like > aprticles without mass (Higgs Bosons) > 3 quarks that their mass is 10percent of the mass of the proton > and therest is GLUEONS .. (:-) Quarks are always in compounds; when one quark drifts froward the others--that is, grows--it loses mass until its field--which is now full of virtval quark compounds and weihty--breaks off into further hadròns. When a hadròn is at ground, its quarks are at their weihtiest. I think I got thet wriht... > exactly an electron for any proton in a heavy Atoms > '''the HUP prevents us from deciding the inner structure of the nuc > ''' > photons without mass !! > etc etc > current physics was taken over by fucken > mathematician that have not the slightest physics touch > so they started loosing the ground of reality > and soaring above solid ground > etc etc money without mass!! time without mass!! room without mass!! charge without mass!! color without mass!! fasis without mass!! freedom without mass!! dumbshit -Aut |