Prev: The New Apple Tablet - $499!
Next: iPad is supercool
From: Wes Groleau on 31 Jan 2010 16:47 Lloyd Parsons wrote: > Now I own an HP Touchsmart 300 which is a touchscreen desktop. For > almost everything you normally do on a desktop computer at home, the > touch is nearly worthless as the apps really don't work well with it. Diminishing returns. If you believe that 95% of potential customers have keyboard and mouse, you don't pay people to tweak your app for touch-screen. -- Wes Groleau Walls Around the Poor http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/russell?itemid=1520
From: Wes Groleau on 31 Jan 2010 16:51 Davoud wrote: > Coming in 2014 or so, available in brown, which Apple's iPad is not, But with an aesthetically pleasing Blue Screen. > and will include trial subscriptions to _four_ anti-virus apps. Take > that, Apple! -- Wes Groleau Opaqueness vs opacity - derivational confusion http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/barrett?itemid=1017
From: Lloyd Parsons on 31 Jan 2010 16:52
In article <hk4tq8$1in$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote: > Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > Now I own an HP Touchsmart 300 which is a touchscreen desktop. For > > almost everything you normally do on a desktop computer at home, the > > touch is nearly worthless as the apps really don't work well with it. > > Diminishing returns. If you believe that 95% of potential customers > have keyboard and mouse, you don't pay people to tweak your app > for touch-screen. Yes, that is certainly true. And in order to change that the providers of touchscreen computers have to figure out a way to encourage developers into that market. That's been the problem with touchscreens since day one. No one was really doing that, or are they now that I can see. For good or bad, Apple and Google are the ones making that move, each in their own way. Windows and the windows OEMs aren't doing so well at it. |