Ohm's Law and Maxwell on Relativity !
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: Neutrino oscillation captured in the lab for the first time
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 19:23 On Jun 1, 3:28 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > you may have a point here > > listen, when length contraction, > space contracts, so the atoms in > it will preserve their shape, if > any > > so no stress whatsoever !!! > > good bye No. Atoms would loose their form. The distance size of the atom in the direction of the moving train would contract. So what you have provided is an excuse eon. The excuse's purpose is to never abandon the failing physics. To never correct it. "The problem in physics is to find the problem." Richard Feynman And correct it. Mitch Raemsch
From: YBM on 1 Jun 2010 19:43 BURT a �crit : > On Jun 1, 3:28 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: >> you may have a point here >> >> listen, when length contraction, >> space contracts, so the atoms in >> it will preserve their shape, if >> any >> >> so no stress whatsoever !!! >> >> good bye > > No. Atoms would loose their form. The distance size of the atom in the > direction of the moving train would contract. It does, this has been proven *experimentaly*.
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 19:56 On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > BURT a écrit : > > > On Jun 1, 3:28 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > >> you may have a point here > > >> listen, when length contraction, > >> space contracts, so the atoms in > >> it will preserve their shape, if > >> any > > >> so no stress whatsoever !!! > > >> good bye > > > No. Atoms would loose their form. The distance size of the atom in the > > direction of the moving train would contract. > > It does, this has been proven *experimentaly*. No. It has never been observed. And there is a good reason. Physics won't work for lopsided atoms in a shrinking train. Mitch Raemsch
From: YBM on 1 Jun 2010 20:01 BURT a �crit : > On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: >> BURT a �crit : >> >>> On Jun 1, 3:28 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: >>>> you may have a point here >>>> listen, when length contraction, >>>> space contracts, so the atoms in >>>> it will preserve their shape, if >>>> any >>>> so no stress whatsoever !!! >>>> good bye >>> No. Atoms would loose their form. The distance size of the atom in the >>> direction of the moving train would contract. >> It does, this has been proven *experimentaly*. > > No. It has never been observed. And there is a good reason. Come on, crank. Have a look to the litterature in experimental physics about ions collisioner. The bloody collisioner wouldn't even work at all if relativistic contraction of nucleus hadn't been taken in account.
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 21:12
On Jun 1, 5:01 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > BURT a écrit : > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > >> BURT a écrit : > > >>> On Jun 1, 3:28 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > >>>> you may have a point here > >>>> listen, when length contraction, > >>>> space contracts, so the atoms in > >>>> it will preserve their shape, if > >>>> any > >>>> so no stress whatsoever !!! > >>>> good bye > >>> No. Atoms would loose their form. The distance size of the atom in the > >>> direction of the moving train would contract. > >> It does, this has been proven *experimentaly*. > > > No. It has never been observed. And there is a good reason. > > Come on, crank. Have a look to the litterature in experimental physics > about ions collisioner. > > The bloody collisioner wouldn't even work at all if relativistic > contraction of nucleus hadn't been taken in account.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You wish. Such a thing is nonsense. You can't claim there is any evidence for it at all. Atom acceleraters don't contract atoms. Your idea that the nucleus needs to contract for acceleration to work is stupid. You have nothing to back you up. Mitch Raemsch Mitch raemsch |