From: Matthew Russotto on
In article <gl4317-0DF6D4.00264523052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Glen Labah <gl4317(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>For example, Google mail is obviously designed for use with windows
>systems and Internet Explorer, as their highlight of read mail shows up
>really well on any Windows / Explorer combination I've seen, but is
>nearly invisible on any Mac I've ever seen G-mail on, no matter what
>browser is being used.

The message and subject are in bold and for unread messages, and the
background is white for unread and grey for read messages. This is
pretty far from invisible.

How does it look on Windows?
--
The problem with socialism is there's always
someone with less ability and more need.
From: Glen Labah on
In article <4K2dnQBPNeH6GmTWnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net>,
russotto(a)grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:

> In article <gl4317-0DF6D4.00264523052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> Glen Labah <gl4317(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >For example, Google mail is obviously designed for use with windows
> >systems and Internet Explorer, as their highlight of read mail shows up
> >really well on any Windows / Explorer combination I've seen, but is
> >nearly invisible on any Mac I've ever seen G-mail on, no matter what
> >browser is being used.
>
> The message and subject are in bold and for unread messages, and the
> background is white for unread and grey for read messages. This is
> pretty far from invisible.
>
> How does it look on Windows?


I think it may be more of a designed for Internet Explorer issue rather
than a windows issue. In both IE for the Mac (back when I still used
that as a browser on a Mac) and on Windows, the background is a much
darker blue (much more blue than grey) for read messages than what I see
on any of the bowsers I have seen on the Mac.

By contrast I find what shows up in Safari and Firefox on the Mac I have
to be very difficult to see.

--
Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam due to e-mail address
harvesters on Usenet. Response time to e-mail sent here is slow.
From: Jonathan N. Little on
Glen Labah wrote:
> I think it may be more of a designed for Internet Explorer issue rather
> than a windows issue. In both IE for the Mac (back when I still used
> that as a browser on a Mac) and on Windows, the background is a much
> darker blue (much more blue than grey) for read messages than what I see
> on any of the bowsers I have seen on the Mac.
>
> By contrast I find what shows up in Safari and Firefox on the Mac I have
> to be very difficult to see.

I think it is more of a user setting than a browser difference, looks
the same in my SeaMonkey v IE.

<http://www.littleworksstudio.com/temp/usenet/smvie.jpg>

Now IE does have a tendency to make text "bolder" than other browsers
which may be from that ClearType feature.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
From: Rhino on

"Andy Dingley" <dingbat(a)codesmiths.com> wrote in message
news:13d5f4d2-e1d3-4496-abc1-ac74255769cf(a)j35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 11 May, 02:17, "rf" <r...(a)z.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I sometimes make a full back of a web site every few minutes if I'm
>> working
>> heavily and fast on it.
>
> I never make backups. I use a version control system (Mercurial or
> Subversion), they do the legwork for me whenever I change anything.
>
> If you have to consciously "make" a backup, it's a basic corollary to
> Sod's Law that you won't have made one at the one time when it turns
> out you needed it. As the choice is either SVN or a Tardis, SVN is
> easier to download and install.

The other advantage of SVN is that strange people and other creatures
sometimes emerge from the Tardis when you least expect it. Far more
troubling than just wonky HTML!

--
Rhino