Op Amp Calculations
in [Design]
|
From: Jim Thompson on 30 Oct 2005 10:59 On 30 Oct 2005 06:12:09 -0800, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > If someone to > the left of Bush brings up some substantive critical point > about his governing, for example, instead of seeing the > issue discussed, we see the person viciously attacked. Come on, Win, get real! Joe Wilson makes Inspector Clouseau look like Sherlock Holmes ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: John Larkin on 30 Oct 2005 12:35 On 30 Oct 2005 06:12:09 -0800, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >keith wrote... >> >> Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >> >>> John Larkin wrote: >>> >>>> People deserve kicking, and whacking with chairs.... er... >>>> exactly when? >>> >>> When you're doing satire. >> >> The "Three Stooges" did that act something like fifty years ago. >> It's no longer funny. Kicks in the groin are *not* satire, >> unless you're pre-pubescent. Oops! > > http://wm.amazon.usa.speedera.net/wm.amazon.usa/books/AMAZON_V6_crop_100k.wmv > > Another right-wing lie. It's clear in the skit Franken > feigned kicking the shin, just above the ankle. No groin > attack that. And you're wrong about "no longer funny," > most of the old classic routines crop up in one form or > another in the comedy world all the time, usually to good > effect, and are revered and appreciated even if not funny. > > What stiffs most of you right-wingers are, with little > sense of humor, unless it's a left-winger being whacked, > then it's funny as all get out! Whacking left-wingers is > a favorite sport of the right-wing crowd. If someone to > the left of Bush brings up some substantive critical point > about his governing, for example, instead of seeing the > issue discussed, we see the person viciously attacked. Win, either you think that freedom of speech, equality under law, and common civility are for everybody, or you think that your team is right, the other guys are wrong, and anything bad you can do to them is OK. Which? John
From: Ken Smith on 30 Oct 2005 12:49 In article <uj63m1p53dbmhsojnq0rs0t3uo4bg985nd(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: [...] >A more important reason people become conservative with age is that >they know they are going to die, and they want their children to >survive and prosper. That only works if you assume that the person was a conservative to start with. A liberal will become more liberal for the same reason. Each side believes that they know what is best for the future of their children. Even the "neocons" seem to become more "neoconish" as they age. In their case, I think it because they know that they will die soon and don't really give the hind most 25% of a rat what happens after that. I'm sure some of them think we are in the "last days" and that any money left over will simply be wasted. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Winfield Hill on 30 Oct 2005 13:05 John Larkin wrote... > > Win, > > either you think that freedom of speech, equality under law, and > common civility are for everybody, > > or > > you think that your team is right, the other guys are wrong, and > anything bad you can do to them is OK. > > > > Which? The first, of course. -- Thanks, - Win
From: Winfield Hill on 30 Oct 2005 13:10
keith wrote... > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:12:09 -0800, Winfield Hill wrote: > >> keith wrote... >>> >>> Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >>> >>>> John Larkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> People deserve kicking, and whacking with chairs.... er... >>>>> exactly when? >>>> >>>> When you're doing satire. >>> >>> The "Three Stooges" did that act something like fifty years ago. >>> It's no longer funny. Kicks in the groin are *not* satire, >>> unless you're pre-pubescent. Oops! >> >>http://wm.amazon.usa.speedera.net/wm.amazon.usa/books/AMAZON_V6_crop_100k.wmv >> >> Another right-wing lie. It's clear in the skit Franken >> feigned kicking the shin, just above the ankle. No groin >> attack that. And you're wrong about "no longer funny," >> most of the old classic routines crop up in one form or >> another in the comedy world all the time, usually to good >> effect, and are revered and appreciated even if not funny. > > A lie? Kicks to the groin are funny, Win? It is a lie when I say > that something isn't funny. You really need to calm down there boy. Look at the wmv file, please, and see that it's clearly no more than 1 foot off the floor, then STOP all your self-righteous pontification. There simply were no "kicks to the groin." You may not have intended a lie, but your FACTS were wrong, so it was a mean vicious lie, against the critics of George Bush. I've noticed you far right-wing types aren't so careful with your facts when you go into attack mode. -- Thanks, - Win |