From: Ken Smith on 26 Oct 2005 10:13 In article <nuntl1lis8o98qhhhvds7d7pc0ca8u0lvn(a)4ax.com>, Jim Thompson <thegreatone(a)example.com> wrote: [...] >I'm happy as a clam! I bought myself a clam, a Crocea Clam, for my >reef tank ;-) Fascinating creature! How do you know that the clam is happy? Perhaps you've just said that you are depressed to the point of killing your self. How tall is the wall of the castle in the tank? Could a clam kill its self by jumping off? :> -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: John Larkin on 26 Oct 2005 11:04 On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:10:22 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >BTW: It is "neocon" not "Neoconservative" . These folks are not >conservatives. They do most of the things that they claim are the sins of >the liberals. "Neoconservative" has been defined as "a liberal who has been mugged by reality." Many are in fact former liberals. The concept is, I think, that the goals of liberalism are approximately correct, but the methods don't work. John
From: Winfield Hill on 26 Oct 2005 10:53 Keith Williams wrote... > Rich Greiss says... >> Winfield Hill wrote: >>> keith wrote... >>>> Winfield Hill wrote: >>>>> keith wrote... >> >> Win, I've been filtering this 'keith' bot for about a year >> now. It never has anything to contribute - please don't >> trollfeed, OK? > > It seems your filter is leaky. You've been answering my > posts, dummy. Not in this thread. He was answering my post. -- Thanks, - Win
From: Keith Williams on 26 Oct 2005 12:50 In article <djo58e0avm(a)drn.newsguy.com>, Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com says... > Keith Williams wrote... > > Rich Greiss says... > >> Winfield Hill wrote: > >>> keith wrote... > >>>> Winfield Hill wrote: > >>>>> keith wrote... > >> > >> Win, I've been filtering this 'keith' bot for about a year > >> now. It never has anything to contribute - please don't > >> trollfeed, OK? > > > > It seems your filter is leaky. You've been answering my > > posts, dummy. > > Not in this thread. He was answering my post. > I don't believe I said anything about "this thread". -- Keith
From: Keith Williams on 26 Oct 2005 12:53
In article <rg6vl1puehfjt38n49599esan9bi0681j5(a)4ax.com>, jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:10:22 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net > (Ken Smith) wrote: > > >BTW: It is "neocon" not "Neoconservative" . These folks are not > >conservatives. They do most of the things that they claim are the sins of > >the liberals. > > "Neoconservative" has been defined as "a liberal who has been mugged > by reality." Many are in fact former liberals. The concept is, I > think, that the goals of liberalism are approximately correct, but the > methods don't work. "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." Benjamin Franklin -- Keith |