Op Amp Calculations
in [Design]
|
From: keith on 25 Oct 2005 22:28 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:03:57 +0000, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:20:11 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote: > >> keith wrote... >>> >>> How come we get all the leftists on the right coast? >>> Blue-nosed red-statist leftists, at that! ;-) >> >> You think it's funny to smear other group members, but >> George Bush is an idiot, pure and simple, and is doing >> us all more damage than we should put up with. That's >> not the least bit funny. I can't understand how you >> right-wingers put up with him. When are y'all going to >> wake up, clear your eyes, and see him for what he is? > > Maybe when DeLay and Rove are in prison. Bets? I'll take all you got, loudmouth! > Maybe when they ramrod that new broad through and make her chief > justice and she strikes down Roe v. Wade. You really should learn something about the system before you make such a *fskng fool* of yourself. Roberts is the Chief Justice, dummy. Sheesh! > Maybe when the oil barons > aren't making a profit off him any more. Maybe when Hell freezes over. Keep dreaming up your falling sky sceneraos, but the sun will rise tomorrow, somewhere (not here - frappin' global warming is snowing on us). ....and I hope they *do* overturn RvW. It was *bad* law. -- Keith
From: Jim Thompson on 25 Oct 2005 22:48 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:22:55 -0400, keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:00:12 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > >> On 25 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700, Winfield Hill >> <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >> >>>John Larkin wrote... >>>> >>>> keith wrote: >>>> >>>>> They don't understand that hate will kill them, both figuratively >>>>> and literally. You can see it here (Win, et. al.). They've gone >>>>> off the left edge. >>>> >>>> Right, ironic that liberalism is so tangled up with anger and hate, >>>> and conservatives seem to laugh a lot. >>> >>> All I can say is, you guys are really out to lunch. Far out. >> >> Lefties can't afford lunch ;-) > >Have you looked at your quarterly tax payment? Well, it's rather large. What's that have to do with "Lefties can't afford lunch"? Oh? Do you mean the percentage restrictions? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: keith on 25 Oct 2005 22:50 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:48:07 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:22:55 -0400, keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >>On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:00:12 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> On 25 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700, Winfield Hill >>> <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >>> >>>>John Larkin wrote... >>>>> >>>>> keith wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They don't understand that hate will kill them, both figuratively >>>>>> and literally. You can see it here (Win, et. al.). They've gone >>>>>> off the left edge. >>>>> >>>>> Right, ironic that liberalism is so tangled up with anger and hate, >>>>> and conservatives seem to laugh a lot. >>>> >>>> All I can say is, you guys are really out to lunch. Far out. >>> >>> Lefties can't afford lunch ;-) >> >>Have you looked at your quarterly tax payment? > > Well, it's rather large. What's that have to do with "Lefties can't > afford lunch"? Oh? Do you mean the percentage restrictions? No. You're buying! (why do they need to be able to "afford" anything) -- Keith
From: Jim Thompson on 25 Oct 2005 23:20 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:50:41 -0400, keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:48:07 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:22:55 -0400, keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:00:12 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: >>> >>>> On 25 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700, Winfield Hill >>>> <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>John Larkin wrote... >>>>>> >>>>>> keith wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They don't understand that hate will kill them, both figuratively >>>>>>> and literally. You can see it here (Win, et. al.). They've gone >>>>>>> off the left edge. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, ironic that liberalism is so tangled up with anger and hate, >>>>>> and conservatives seem to laugh a lot. >>>>> >>>>> All I can say is, you guys are really out to lunch. Far out. >>>> >>>> Lefties can't afford lunch ;-) >>> >>>Have you looked at your quarterly tax payment? >> >> Well, it's rather large. What's that have to do with "Lefties can't >> afford lunch"? Oh? Do you mean the percentage restrictions? > >No. You're buying! (why do they need to be able to "afford" anything) I'm trying to remember now... I believe Win bought _at_least_ one round. Good lefties aren't poor... they just like to imply that they're the savior of the poor... but watch what Teddy DOESN'T do for Maynard High School ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Ken Smith on 26 Oct 2005 10:10
In article <uhntl1tmbnargi4ucnhrcb2spbtnctaare(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:26:17 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net >(Ken Smith) wrote: >>We all like "mom and apple pie" is very like the statement "we all hate >>terrorism". The extreme right has supported terrorists in the past. They >>called them "freedom fighters but they were in fact terrorists". >> > >Only if they randomly kill civilians for the explicit purpose of >terrorizing them. That isn't the same as, say, funding an insurgency >or encouraging a Bay of Pigs type thing. Yes that is a fair definition of terrorism. The US has supported such people BTW. > >>These are "neocons" we are talking about here. Being paranoid is required >>for entry into that club. > >Neoconservatives have a rational, and rather humanist, argument for >their politics, and it arguably makes sense... at least as much sense >as any liberal philosophy I've heard of. The "neocons" have about the same rational arguments as the person who burns down houses to kill the ghosts they contain. There is logic, of sorts, at work but the conclusions aren't very good. BTW: It is "neocon" not "Neoconservative" . These folks are not conservatives. They do most of the things that they claim are the sins of the liberals. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |