Origins of the universe
in [Math]
|
Prev: Mathematical Intelligencer's lifting and infringement on AP's sci.math posts #601 ,602, 603 Correcting Math
Next: Mathematical Intelligencer's lifting and infringement on AP's sci.math posts #601 ,602, 603 Correcting Math
From: mpc755 on 30 Jun 2010 19:33 On Jun 30, 11:23�am, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 29, 1:57�pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 29, 5:56�am,funkenstein<luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 29, 2:07 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 28, 10:35 am, Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nos...(a)hotmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 27 June, 22:48, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 5:18 pm, Mark Isaak <eci...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:31:26 -0700, mpc755 wrote: > > > > > > > > �[snip] > > > > > Every double slit experiment ever performed has ALWAYS detected the > > > > particle exiting a single slit. > > > > No, only the ones that don't observe an interference pattern. > > > An experiment is performed in order to determine if the particle exits > > a single slit or multiple slits in a double slit experiment. > > That is a modified double slit experiment. �Try Feynman's lectures on > physics for an introduction. > It is an experiment to determine if the particle exits a single slit or multiple slits. When the experiment is performed the particle is always detected exiting a single slit. This is experimental evidence the particle always exits a single slit. > or even:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment�: > > "Any modification of the apparatus that can determine which slit a > photon passes through destroys the interference pattern" > Any modification of the apparatus that can determine which slit a photon passes through destroys the coherence of the associated aether wave and that is why there is no interference pattern. > > Every > > time the experiment has ever been performed the particle has always > > been detected exiting a single slit. > > What experiment are you talking about? > The classical double slit experiment explicitly has no means of > determining which slit an individual particle goes through. �If you > are referring to a specific experiment you should be more clear. > The experiment where detectors are placed at the exits in order to determine if the particle enters a single slit or multiple slits. > > This is experiment evidence the > > particle always exits a single slit. In the absurd nonsense of the > > Copenhagen interpretation of QM must you ignore experimental evidence. > > > Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > slit experiment? > > Which modified double slit experiment are you talking about? The experiment where detectors are placed at the exits in order to determine if the particle enters a single slit or multiple slits. The particle is always detected exiting a single slit. This is experimental evidence the particle always exits a single slit. In Aether Displacement, the associated aether wave enters and exits multiple slits and created interference upon exiting the slits altering the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.
From: mpc755 on 30 Jun 2010 20:53
On Jun 30, 3:59�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...(a)buzz.off> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:42:13 +1000, the following appeared > in talk.origins, posted by j...(a)wilkins.id.au (John S. > Wilkins): > > > > >Mike Lyle <mike_lyle...(a)REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >> Androcles wrote: > >> > "Mark Isaak" <eci...(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > >> >news:pan.2010.06.27.21.17.55.126266(a)earthlink.net... > >> >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:31:26 -0700, mpc755 wrote: > > >> >>> Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The > >> >>> material is maether. > >> >>> Maether has mass. > >> >>> Aether and matter have mass. > >> >>> Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. > >> >>> Aether is displaced by matter. > > >> >> In what muniverse? > > >> > The monoverse. > > >> No, the form with the greatest possible number: the perverse. > > >Well it's not the one we are in: the inverse. > > As for mpc755's word salad, I'd go with blank verse. > -- > > Bob C. > > "Evidence confirming an observation is > evidence that the observation is wrong." > � � � � � � � � � � � � � - McNameless Matter and aether are different states of the same material. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the neighboring aether and matter is energy. |