Physical Explanation for E=mc^2
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
Next: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely youcan't be serious.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 09:26 On Feb 13, 9:17 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Feb 13, 6:03 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > and matter is energy. > > > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > > > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > > > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > > > matter and aether in neighboring places. > > > The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on > > the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably > > modify the equation to be A=Mc^2, where 'A' is aether and 'M' is > > matter, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume > > between matter and aether.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Imbecile. Autistic. Autistic imbecile. Energy is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the surrounding matter and aether. I take it when you think of E=mc^2 you are probably thinking the matter 'converts' to energy? What happened to the mass associated with the matter? Did it disappear? And if you say matter 'becomes' energy then you still have the same issue of what happened to the mass because energy is mass-less. So, in E=mc^2, what happens to the mass? In nuclear fission and nuclear fusion, when energy is created, is there more, less, or the same amount of mass in existence in the universe?
From: Igor on 13 Feb 2010 09:34 On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > matter and aether in neighboring places. Funny, but quantum theory explains these things quite well without ever remotely mentioning your silly aether.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 09:39 On Feb 13, 9:34 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > > matter and aether in neighboring places. > > Funny, but quantum theory explains these things quite well without > ever remotely mentioning your silly aether. So, in quantum theory, what happens to the mass? Does it still exist? If so, as what?
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 11:14 On Feb 13, 9:34 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > > matter and aether in neighboring places. > > Funny, but quantum theory explains these things quite well without > ever remotely mentioning your silly aether. Energy is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the surrounding matter and aether. I take it when you think of E=mc^2 you are probably thinking the matter 'converts' to energy? What happened to the mass associated with the matter? Did it disappear? And if you say matter 'becomes' energy then you still have the same issue of what happened to the mass because energy is mass-less. So, in E=mc^2, what happens to the mass? In quantum theory, in nuclear fission and nuclear fusion, when energy is created, is there more, less, or the same amount of mass in existence in the universe? If there is more or the same what does it exist as? In AD, the mass still exists, as aether.
From: bert on 13 Feb 2010 12:43
On Feb 13, 9:03 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > > matter and aether in neighboring places. > > The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on > the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably > modify the equation to be A=Mc^2, where 'A' is aether and 'M' is > matter, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume > between matter and aether.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - mpc Einstein I know would go with my G=EMC^2 I met him in 1951 and we talked about this one on one TreBert |