Physics

Paging Dr. Venkman was Re: And if it escapes was Re: Desktop holographicRoomtop was Re: Making a Veldt was Re: Interfacing with AI
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=OawD-t3s0PQ&feature=related Are we starting to get the picture yet? They are using a computer already so why do we need quantum computers? Not just that but almost everyone has the innate ability to use and create virtual spaces in their own imagination and through the collec... 22 Jun 2010 14:56

GOOD GAWD! .
< http://edconrad.com/pics/Miracle.jpg < http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/page5_files/body_data/proof10.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/index.html < http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/page5_files/body_data/proof2.jpg < http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/page4_files/body_data/proof8.jp... 22 Jun 2010 12:42

CFP: Optical SuperComputing Workshop 2010: Deadline Extension
CFP: Optical SuperComputing Workshop 2010: Deadline Extension 3rd International Workshop on Optical SuperComputing in Bertinoro (OSC10) November 17-19, Bertinoro, Italy http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~dolev/OSC10 SCOPE: OSC, the International Workshop on Optical SuperComputing, is an annual forum for resear... 22 Jun 2010 10:28

nutbag iamdyke Hates the US and cannot dispute that PNAC "wantedthe attack" because that is the reality - inside job proven
* US * wrote: http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf Their own words. Here's a direct quote: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event � like a new Pearl Harbor."... 22 Jun 2010 10:28

COME SEE * HATES US * EPIC FAIL -- "thinks" his cite says PNAC "wanted the attack" when his own cite shows it said NO SUCH THING! Iarnrod WINS again
On Jun 22, 6:00 am, * Hates US * wrote: http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf Their own words. None of which are the words you use. Hint: PNAC *never* said it wanted an attack, kooker. You're lying. Your own cite proves you're lying. Watch the bushworshipper writhe and sp... 22 Jun 2010 08:16

9-11 was, of course, an inside job.
He would know. His points remain undisputed. "28-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job" http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/070906insidejob.htm ... 3 Aug 2010 11:27

IRREVERSIBILITY OF TIME
Sometimes, generality is in tiny details. Maybe therefore it's not in here: http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/93470d4b6a380563 But in here: http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/ffce208afa5b2555 Han de Bruijn ... 22 Jun 2010 06:06

Numerical Ensemble of Harmonic Oscillators
Hypothesis: ---------- | ALL LAWS OF NATURE ARE ONLY APPROXIMATELY TRUE Just take it or leave it. I'm not going to defend this as a new kind of dogma. Instead, we are going to explore some consequences of the proposition, in a very specific mathematical sense. And that's it. As an application of the above Hyp... 23 Jun 2010 07:20

a check on my derivation "elementary charge e" out of pure math; 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #190; ATOM TOTALITY
My oh my, the phi number is really turning up all over the place in physics, like blue bonnetts in an Onderdonck (spelling?) painting. Since my last post I was wondering if it was consistent with other numbers in physics. Physicists rarely think like mathematicians as regards to consistency as a means of check... 22 Jun 2010 14:56

deriving "elementary charge e" out of pure math; 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #189; ATOM TOTALITY
I always enter these challenges by saying they are horrifically difficult, in case I make no progress. But it seems as though I always make progress on these challenges. Charge as a physics characteristic or attribute, is a rather difficult concept. Unlike speed where we know it is distance/time, with charge w... 22 Jun 2010 02:52