Ping Bil Slowman; The global warming hoax reveiled
in [Design]
|
From: Jan Panteltje on 21 Nov 2009 17:36 On a sunny day (Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:10:31 -0800) it happened Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in <7mr3a8F3jab6eU3(a)mid.individual.net>: >> One can wonder what the real truth is, about temperature, and then again about >> what causes it, you know there were, and will be, ice ages, nobody >> was having coal plants in the previous one to create CO2 (in the Netherlands they now want to store the CO2 >> in the ground under my house almost), so, all feeble science. > > >Time to sell? Once this sort of "project" has moved along far enough you >might not be able to, for the price you'd want. Could be, I already looked up if CO2 was heavier then air (it is): http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090611040945AAPt3oV else it would be very dangerous to live here. But some geological processes could push it upwards, you would get suffocated in your sleep, nowhere to run, even if you found out what was happening. CO2 detector, oxygen equipment, fast car or helicopter, and you MAY have a chance :-) It is an idiotic idea, the greenies create things that are more dangerous then what the want to fight. Like more people die in coal mining in one year _an other 30 or so in China today_ then in all nuclear accidents that ever happened, that is why the greenies are against nuke power??? And nuke power makes no CO2. It is, as opposed to Bill's constant insulting of others by suggesting they have no scientific understanding or education, the most *stupid* little greenies club that does this over and over again, manipulated by energy haters like Gore. If it was for the greenies we would all be living in grass shacks without heating and eating grass too.
From: Joerg on 21 Nov 2009 17:41 Jan Panteltje wrote: > On a sunny day (Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:10:31 -0800) it happened Joerg > <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in <7mr3a8F3jab6eU3(a)mid.individual.net>: > >>> One can wonder what the real truth is, about temperature, and then again about >>> what causes it, you know there were, and will be, ice ages, nobody >>> was having coal plants in the previous one to create CO2 (in the Netherlands they now want to store the CO2 >>> in the ground under my house almost), so, all feeble science. >> >> Time to sell? Once this sort of "project" has moved along far enough you >> might not be able to, for the price you'd want. > > > Could be, I already looked up if CO2 was heavier then air (it is): > http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090611040945AAPt3oV > else it would be very dangerous to live here. > But some geological processes could push it upwards, you would get suffocated in your sleep, > nowhere to run, even if you found out what was happening. > CO2 detector, oxygen equipment, fast car or helicopter, and you MAY have a chance :-) If for some reason pressure shifts down there and a bubble gets pushed up you may not have time to start the turbo-shaft engine in your helicopter. Besides you sitting there slumped over the controls, it also needs some oxygen to work. > It is an idiotic idea, the greenies create things that are more dangerous then what the want to fight. > Like more people die in coal mining in one year _an other 30 or so in China today_ then in all nuclear accidents that ever happened, > that is why the greenies are against nuke power??? And nuke power makes no CO2. The topper was a guy in a Hawkwer business jet, had to call a missed approach at Beijing airport. The weather was fine but he could not see the runway at decision height. Because of the smog ... > It is, as opposed to Bill's constant insulting of others by suggesting they have > no scientific understanding or education, the most *stupid* little greenies club that does this over and over > again, manipulated by energy haters like Gore. > If it was for the greenies we would all be living in grass shacks without heating and eating grass too. > But they'd keep on driving their Volvos :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: John Larkin on 21 Nov 2009 18:00 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:54:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >The global warming hoax revealed: > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?partner=rss&emc=rss > ><Quote from that article> >This shows these are people willing to bend rules and >go after other people's reputations in very serious ways,' he said. Spencer >R. Weart, a physicist and historian who is charting the course of research >on global warming, said the hacked material would serve as 'great material >for historians.' ><end quote> > >LOL. >Some science! > >And that in a leftist newspaper! > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html?mod=googlenews_wsj "In several of the emails, climate researchers discussed how to arrange for favorable reviewers for papers they planned to publish in scientific journals. At the same time, climate researchers at times appeared to pressure scientific journals not to publish research by other scientists whose findings they disagreed with." Some good stuff here: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/hadley_hacked/ " The other paper by MM is just garbage � as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility as well by replying to the mad Finn as well � frequently as I see it. I can�t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. K and I will keep them out somehow � even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is ! " John
From: John Fields on 21 Nov 2009 20:36 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:46:02 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Nov 21, 7:03�pm, Raveninghorde <raveninghorde(a)invalid> wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:53:00 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Nov 21, 6:54�am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> The global warming hoax revealed: >> >> �http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?partne... >> >> >> <Quote from that article> >> >> This shows these are people willing to bend rules and >> >> go after other people's reputations in very serious ways,' he said. Spencer >> >> R. Weart, a physicist and historian who is charting the course of research >> >> on global warming, said the hacked material would serve as 'great material >> >> for historians.' >> >> <end quote> >> >> >> LOL. >> >> Some science! >> >> >> And that in a leftist newspaper! >> >> >Summary: >> >http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/the-telegraph-picks-up-... >> >> >Details: >> >http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-... >> >> And a search engine for CRU emails >> >> www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/- Hide quoted text - > >Ravinghorde is going to be even more of a nuisance than he is at the >moment. > >His ignorance is such that he regularly quotes real scientific papers >to support arguments that they actively contradict. > >Given a bunch of private e-mails that he can quote out of context, he >can be predicted to find "evidence" for life-time's worth of insane >conspiracy theories. --- Interesting. The sky is falling around the doom and gloom boys, and especially around that insufferable fatass Al Gore leech, and you're still kissing their asses because you don't want to admit that you were blinded by their bullshit "science". But it's not really your fault, poor baby, and because you don't know enough about it to allow you to make objective decisions about the conclusions come to by your suicidols, you then tie in with them since they're a bunch of crooks who talk the same language you do. JF
From: Bill Sloman on 21 Nov 2009 20:44
On Nov 21, 11:41 pm, Joerg <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > Jan Panteltje wrote: > > On a sunny day (Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:10:31 -0800) it happened Joerg > > <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in <7mr3a8F3jab6...(a)mid.individual.net>: > > >>> One can wonder what the real truth is, about temperature, and then again about > >>> what causes it, you know there were, and will be, ice ages, nobody > >>> was having coal plants in the previous one to create CO2 (in the Netherlands they now want to store the CO2 > >>> in the ground under my house almost), so, all feeble science. > > >> Time to sell? Once this sort of "project" has moved along far enough you > >> might not be able to, for the price you'd want. > > > Could be, I already looked up if CO2 was heavier then air (it is): > > http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090611040945AAPt3oV > > else it would be very dangerous to live here. > > But some geological processes could push it upwards, you would get suffocated in your sleep, > > nowhere to run, even if you found out what was happening. > > CO2 detector, oxygen equipment, fast car or helicopter, and you MAY have a chance :-) > > If for some reason pressure shifts down there and a bubble gets pushed > up you may not have time to start the turbo-shaft engine in your > helicopter. Besides you sitting there slumped over the controls, it also > needs some oxygen to work. Of course, if this were likely to happen, Barendrecht would have vanished in a giant fireball sometime in the last few thousand years, when the - now exhausted - natural gas field under the town had pushed a bubble of natural gas up to the surface. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i0gwwjN8hkEa1SyfHo_b7LhZ3z2A <snipped the rest of the idiot anxieties> -- Bill Sloman, Nijmgen |