Plate techtonics faces a problem
in [Relativity]
|
From: purple on 13 Jun 2010 08:40 On 6/12/2010 3:29 PM, rick_s wrote: > What is interesting to physicists is that the long necked dinos could not > live in todays gravity because their hearts were too small for their > body. Creationist?
From: purple on 13 Jun 2010 08:51 On 6/12/2010 3:29 PM, rick_s wrote: > In article > <3e4e7f14-3297-485d-b2d9-779899b50893(a)b15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, > macromitch(a)yahoo.com says... >> >> >> Pangea is taking the continental plates and then flowing them back >> together artificially. What about the plates under the ocean? >> >> The whole earth is covered in plates. So how can they move when there >> is no where to go? >> >> Plate techtonics as it stands is wrong science. The plates under the >> oceans don't go away. >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > > Here is a better theory...from the mouth of a geologist. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f6hcGJbjL0 I don't do youtube, but this sounds you're relying on Don Findlay (or someone like him) as an expert. Laughable. > What is interesting to physicists is that the long necked dinos could not > live in todays gravity because their hearts were too small for their > body.
From: Don Stockbauer on 13 Jun 2010 09:09 On Jun 13, 12:34 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 12, 9:07 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 12, 10:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Pangea is taking the continental plates and then flowing them back > > > together artificially. What about the plates under the ocean? > > > > The whole earth is covered in plates. So how can they move when there > > > is no where to go? > > > > Plate techtonics as it stands is wrong science. The plates under the > > > oceans don't go away. > > > Under each other. Over each other. Slide by each other. > > > Any other stupid questions? > > The cover the whole Earth with ahrdly any seperation inbetween. So? Under each other. Over each other. Slide by each other. So all those movements are vastly small. They just about cover the whole > Earth under the ocean and for land obviously. So? > > Maybe people sightsee these small gaps. I don't know. I don't think they do, there are more scenic places to sightsee, like The Great Sand Dunes of Colorado, The Pyramids, etc.
From: Thomas Heger on 13 Jun 2010 13:57 rick_s schrieb: > In article > <3e4e7f14-3297-485d-b2d9-779899b50893(a)b15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, > macromitch(a)yahoo.com says... >> >> Pangea is taking the continental plates and then flowing them back >> together artificially. What about the plates under the ocean? >> >> The whole earth is covered in plates. So how can they move when there >> is no where to go? >> >> Plate techtonics as it stands is wrong science. The plates under the >> oceans don't go away. >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > > Here is a better theory...from the mouth of a geologist. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f6hcGJbjL0 > I like this video. Its even better than those of Neil Adams. Neil Adams is actually a famous cartoon artist and made very good animations. He is usually kind of grim, because nobody seems to believe him. But that's wrong. I guess a lot of geologists secretly think, this theory - that once was mainstream - is actually true, but are wise enough to keep their mouth shut. The problem for our current mainstream is, that this theory is in direct contradiction to some important other theories. It is more or less easy to show, that the Earth is in fact growing. But not only growing, but gaining mass, too. This would somehow explain, why it is here in the first place. But that would be a deadly hit to the big-bang nucleosynthesis, the particle concept and various other assumptions, a great deal of our understanding is based on. So, if the 'growing earth hypothesis' is proven to be correct, than we had to rethink the concept of elementary particles. TH
From: Richard Henry on 13 Jun 2010 14:26
On Jun 12, 8:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Pangea is taking the continental plates and then flowing them back > together artificially. What about the plates under the ocean? > > The whole earth is covered in plates. So how can they move when there > is no where to go? > > Plate techtonics as it stands is wrong science. The plates under the > oceans don't go away. > > Mitch Raemsch Continental drift is measurable, and is regularly measured. |