QT display all the quality of HD 1080p - or not?
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: bible stuff
Next: Recommend OCR programs?
From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson on 25 Jun 2010 02:09 Mark Conrad wrote: > ...or, to spell it out for the simpletons in this thread, > to analyze a similar Logic Puzzle to bring out the fact > that the ample blood samples in the OJ Simpson case > would deteriorate and become useless as evidence if > the blood was not carefully collected and refrigerated. Mark, I don't know about anyone else, but OUR differeces are very simply put, you claim that the evidence if it had been preserved would have pointed to OJ, while I make no such assumptions. The only thing I state is that since it was not preserved, it proves nothing. If it had been preserved, it may have pointed to OJ or it may not. It may have pointed to someone else or it may not. No way of knowing. Everything else is speculation. Personally I don't care who did. All I know for sure is that the murder, whomever they were went free. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm(a)mendelson.com N3OWJ/4X1GM I do multitasking. If that bothers you, file a complaint and I will start ignoring it immediately.
From: Mark Conrad on 25 Jun 2010 08:58 In article <slrni28hqi.3ku.gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com>, Geoffrey S. Mendelson <gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com> wrote: > The only thing I state is that since it was not preserved, it proves nothing. > If it had been preserved, it may have pointed to OJ or it may not. It may > have pointed to someone else or it may not. No way of knowing. All true, that we can agree on, as reasonable people. > Everything else is speculation. Not quite everything else. The matter of the incompetence of the L.A. Police Dept at the time is _not_ speculation. Part of that incompetence is the direct result of the police dept as a whole of being rotten logic puzzle solvers. For example: blood + (bad preservation environment) + (murderer going free) ....meant absolutely nothing to the incompetent police "professionals" handling the case, because they were lousy at connecting-the-simple-dots. By contrast, logic puzzle solvers are good at connecting-the-dots. As Michelle would probably say, blood + (bad preservation environment) + (murderer going free) ...."that is all irrelevant" [sic] Yeah, r-i-g-h-t, that is probably the result of Michelle running one too many marathons, baked Michelle's brain. > Personally I don't care who did. I do. As a taxpayer in this country, I don't like paying for circus trials brought about by incompetent problem solvers. > All I know for sure is that the murder, > whomever they were went free. That too. Mark-
From: Doug Anderson on 25 Jun 2010 11:08 Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> writes: > In article <slrni28hqi.3ku.gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com>, Geoffrey S. > Mendelson <gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com> wrote: > > > The only thing I state is that since it was not preserved, it proves nothing. > > If it had been preserved, it may have pointed to OJ or it may not. It may > > have pointed to someone else or it may not. No way of knowing. > > All true, that we can agree on, as reasonable people. > > > > Everything else is speculation. > > Not quite everything else. The matter of the incompetence > of the L.A. Police Dept at the time is _not_ speculation. > > Part of that incompetence is the direct result of the police dept > as a whole of being rotten logic puzzle solvers. That's the bit you keep saying that is complete nonsense. Even if one accepts that OJ was acquited because the LAPD didn't do a good job preserving evidence, that has nothing to do with being a puzzle solver. There is no difficult logic puzzle to solve in knowing that if you don't preserve evidence, it may not be useful at a trial. This isn't a case of some tricky work connecting the dots.
From: Warren Oates on 25 Jun 2010 12:07 In article <qv8w63qhdy.fsf(a)ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Even if one accepts that OJ was acquited because the LAPD didn't do a > good job preserving evidence, that has nothing to do with being a > puzzle solver. OJ got off because Mark Fuhrman was corrupt pig. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer
From: Warren Oates on 25 Jun 2010 13:25
In article <michelle-862206.09224325062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > Exactly. That's the only reason he got off. Furhman was so bad a cop, there were even books written about how _he_ might have been the murderer. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer |