From: krw on
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:05:29 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
<dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On 26/04/2010 23:32, Joel Koltner wrote:
>> <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
>> news:6j3ct59lnb6vj2di6v68lnirs2g1rr66ll(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:19:01 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
>>>> Yeah, but up until the past couple of decades, the engines were a lot
>>>> more
>>>> cantankerous than gasoline-powered engines. You still see glow-plug
>>>> switches
>>>> on some trucks today, yet even the cheapest automobile hasn't had a
>>>> manual
>>>> throttle in about 35 years now. Bizarre...
>>> Perhaps because truck drivers can be bothered to learn how to drive their
>>> vehicles.
>>
>> OK, but where's the payback? Look at how popular automatics are today --
>> the vast majority of people don't value the extra bit of control that
>> manual transmissions, engine controls, etc. might given them. The fact
>> that you can make a diesel today that the average consumer will find as
>> easy to operate to an ICE (and for no more cost but with a bit better
>> efficiency) is what will slowly drive their adoption. (Although these
>> days the big thing is hybrids and all, so I fully expect that diesels
>> won't make up any significant percentage of consumer vehicles in the
>> foreseeable future.)
>
>I assume you are talking solely about the USA?
>In Europe the situation is very different. In the UK, for example, half
>of cars sold are diesel. I drive a 2.0L VW Golf diesel, which averages
>50mpg.

You don't have the EPA. When gasoline was $4/gallon, diesel was over $5,
thanks to the EPA.
From: Joel Koltner on
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
news:fpbct5tsv3hgt5oteoi5u9tm4ugcahja41(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:46 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
> <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Could be. What are your predictions for the types of cars that'll be common
>>in the coming decades?
> Have you ever watched the Flintstones?

Ah, so it's a healthcare initiative as well -- daily exercise included with
every trip to the store!

From: Don Lancaster on
On 4/26/2010 11:40 AM, Joel Koltner wrote:
> "Don Lancaster" <don(a)tinaja.com> wrote in message
> news:83m3p7Ff9gU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> <http://www.tinaja.com/etsamp1.asp>
>
> Don, do you still write columns like that for any of the remaining
> hobbyist magazines out there?
>
> Got a list of all the magazines you've written columns for anyway? :-)
>
> Weren't you even in Midnight Engineering for awhile? (Great name for a
> magazine -- I quit subscribing after I graduated from college,
> apparently it ceased publication not too long thereafter?)
>
> ---Joel
>

Hobbiest magazines stopped paying their authors a living wage two
decades ago.

At that time I moved online. Most column reprints can be found at
<http://www.tinaja.com>

Current publications are often found at <http://www.tinaja.com/gurgrm01.asp>

--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don(a)tinaja.com

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
From: Michael A. Terrell on

"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:55:08 -0700, Jim Thompson
> <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:46 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
> ><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >>
> >>Would you wager any money yet on Obama being a one-term president? :-)
> >[snip]
> >>---Joel
> >
> >I'll wager the Dems will retain control of Congress in 2010, and Obama
> >will get a second term.
>
> I'll take the bet.
>
> >To see how that will happen, just look at Florida... loser Repubs will
> >run as independents, splitting the vote, allowing Dem wins.
>
> I thought so at first too, but the Tea Partiers don't seem to be that stupid.
> They'll be fragged, first. If Crist ran as an independent, he could easily
> come in second, but the Rubio would still win.


I'm already sick of the continuous Rubio pol ads on TV. They run
back to back, all day long.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: krw on
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:08:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:55:08 -0700, Jim Thompson
>> <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:46 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
>> ><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >[snip]
>> >>
>> >>Would you wager any money yet on Obama being a one-term president? :-)
>> >[snip]
>> >>---Joel
>> >
>> >I'll wager the Dems will retain control of Congress in 2010, and Obama
>> >will get a second term.
>>
>> I'll take the bet.
>>
>> >To see how that will happen, just look at Florida... loser Repubs will
>> >run as independents, splitting the vote, allowing Dem wins.
>>
>> I thought so at first too, but the Tea Partiers don't seem to be that stupid.
>> They'll be fragged, first. If Crist ran as an independent, he could easily
>> come in second, but the Rubio would still win.
>
>
> I'm already sick of the continuous Rubio pol ads on TV. They run
>back to back, all day long.

That's what it takes. People are dense.