Specter Pro -- Spyware
in [Anti-Virus]
|
Prev: Is MBAM is a 100% safe application
Next: Virus? - Many program does not work (iexplorer, controllpanel etc)
From: FromTheRafters on 4 May 2010 07:34 "G. Morgan" <usenet_abuse(a)gawab.com> wrote in message news:f0qvt5de0n33h376u9rj3335mhid685n9v(a)4ax.com... > "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> >>The *malware* to detect, would be the surreptitious installer (trojan) >>of the keylogger. Since you evidently installed it yourself, there >>*is* >>no malware to detect. If this program comes with a way to install it >>surreptitiously, then that function (or it's result) *should* be >>detected. What you would need in order to prevent one administrator >>from >>being able to detect that the other' has installed spyware is to have >>the whole deal on a monitor or hypervisor where one administrates the >>"platform" on which both administrators appear to administrate in the >>emulated "environment". > > I also do house calls on the side. I would like a program that > detects ALL key > loggers, not just non-commercial ones. Husband spying on wife, etc... I'm speculating here that some antispyware vendors would be willing to supply detection for these once they are reported to them.
From: JD on 4 May 2010 08:41 ~BD~ wrote: > JD wrote: > >> >> We have a term down here in Texas. It's called "pi$$ing into the wind." >> We try not to do that but sometimes one misjudges the wind direction. >> > > Maybe that's why your still wet behind the ears! ;) Good one, baiter Dave. I give up. You win! -- JD..
From: ~BD~ on 4 May 2010 12:35 JD wrote: > ~BD~ wrote: >> JD wrote: >> >>> >>> We have a term down here in Texas. It's called "pi$$ing into the wind." >>> We try not to do that but sometimes one misjudges the wind direction. >>> >> >> Maybe that's why your still wet behind the ears! ;) > > Good one, baiter Dave. I give up. You win! > Thanks! :) A lesson here for you ........... http://eadi9.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dont-mess-with-old-folks/ Quite an appropriate joke in view of the thread posts! ;-) -- Dave
From: Jenn on 4 May 2010 13:43 "JD" <JD(a)example.invalid> wrote in message news:LeadncNBJ_fLG0LWnZ2dnUVZ_qsAAAAA(a)posted.grandecom... > FromTheRafters wrote: > > We have a term down here in Texas. It's called "pi$$ing into the wind." We > try not to do that but sometimes one mis-judges the wind direction. > > -- > ....again with the mature comments littered with foul language that you think makes you look somehow more manly and smart.... Texas sayings isn't going to make up for a low IQ. -- Jenn (from Oklahoma) http://pqlr.org/bbs/
From: Dustin Cook on 4 May 2010 15:46
"FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:hrp0o3$cnm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > "G. Morgan" <usenet_abuse(a)gawab.com> wrote in message > news:f0qvt5de0n33h376u9rj3335mhid685n9v(a)4ax.com... >> "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> >>>The *malware* to detect, would be the surreptitious installer >>>(trojan) of the keylogger. Since you evidently installed it yourself, >>>there *is* >>>no malware to detect. If this program comes with a way to install it >>>surreptitiously, then that function (or it's result) *should* be >>>detected. What you would need in order to prevent one administrator >>>from >>>being able to detect that the other' has installed spyware is to have >>>the whole deal on a monitor or hypervisor where one administrates the >>>"platform" on which both administrators appear to administrate in the >>>emulated "environment". >> >> I also do house calls on the side. I would like a program that >> detects ALL key >> loggers, not just non-commercial ones. Husband spying on wife, >> etc... > > I'm speculating here that some antispyware vendors would be willing to > supply detection for these once they are reported to them. > > > I would have to agree. :) -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior |