From: bert on 11 Apr 2010 13:56 On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > Mitch Raemsch I mean time measurement is different. TreBert
From: BURT on 11 Apr 2010 16:28 On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? Mitsch Raemsch
From: BURT on 11 Apr 2010 19:35 On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 15 Apr 2010 12:53 On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > Mitch Raemsch Burt, you're a two-timer.
From: BURT on 15 Apr 2010 15:13 On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate over energy. Mitch Reamsch
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: The first finite Next: The Doppler effect and its meaning about photon energy emission !! |