From: bert on
On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is
> > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates
> > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is
> > different on the poles than on the equator.  Think about it  TreBert
>
> You mean things in "time" "take place?"
>
> Mitch Raemsch

I mean time measurement is different. TreBert
From: BURT on
On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is
> > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates
> > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is
> > > different on the poles than on the equator.  Think about it  TreBert
>
> > You mean things in "time" "take place?"
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> I mean time measurement is different.   TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts?

Mitsch Raemsch
From: BURT on
On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is
> > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates
> > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up.
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is
> > > > different on the poles than on the equator.  Think about it  TreBert
>
> > > You mean things in "time" "take place?"
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > I mean time measurement is different.   TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts?
>
> Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on
On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is
> > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates
> > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up.
>
> > > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is
> > > > > different on the poles than on the equator.  Think about it  TreBert
>
> > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?"
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > I mean time measurement is different.   TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts?
>
> > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Energy flowing through space with  aether rate flowing over it.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Burt, you're a two-timer.
From: BURT on
On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is
> > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates
> > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up.
>
> > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is
> > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator.  Think about it  TreBert
>
> > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?"
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > I mean time measurement is different.   TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts?
>
> > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Energy flowing through space with  aether rate flowing over it.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate
over energy.

Mitch Reamsch