Stephen Hawking and Two Physical Times
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 18 Apr 2010 16:04 On Apr 16, 9:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 9:26 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate > > > over energy. > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > The Aether has been discredited. So you believe it to be real?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > No one has disproven the mathemitcal flow rate of time. > > Aether flows. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There are two slowing rates in the universe. These are slowing down from a fastest rate starting point. Gravity and motion slow their time from its fastest starting point. For energy everything is happening in these two times. Two universal rates both slowdown for one clock frame. Mitch Raemsch; Everything is happening in two times
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 00:00 On Apr 18, 1:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 9:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 9:26 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate > > > > over energy. > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > The Aether has been discredited. So you believe it to be real?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > No one has disproven the mathemitcal flow rate of time. > > > Aether flows. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > There are two slowing rates in the universe. These are slowing down > from a fastest rate starting point. Gravity and motion slow their time > from its fastest starting point. For energy everything is happening in > these two times. Two universal rates both slowdown for one clock > frame. > > Mitch Raemsch; Everything is happening in two times- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gravity slows time. Energy flow has a rate through space. These are the two times of GR gravity and SR motion time. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 23:06 On Apr 25, 9:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 18, 1:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 9:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 16, 9:26 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 15, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > > > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate > > > > > over energy. > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > > The Aether has been discredited. So you believe it to be real?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > No one has disproven the mathemitcal flow rate of time. > > > > Aether flows. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > There are two slowing rates in the universe. These are slowing down > > from a fastest rate starting point. Gravity and motion slow their time > > from its fastest starting point. For energy everything is happening in > > these two times. Two universal rates both slowdown for one clock > > frame. > > > Mitch Raemsch; Everything is happening in two times- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity slows time. Energy flow has a rate through space. These are > the two times of GR gravity and SR motion time. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The two rates slow down from a maximum time speed. They come together as a one time flow over energy for matter. Matter has two time rates that come together and is taking place in. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 27 Apr 2010 03:55 On Apr 26, 10:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 25, 9:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 18, 1:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 16, 9:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 16, 9:26 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > > > > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate > > > > > > over energy. > > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > > > The Aether has been discredited. So you believe it to be real?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > No one has disproven the mathemitcal flow rate of time. > > > > > Aether flows. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > There are two slowing rates in the universe. These are slowing down > > > from a fastest rate starting point. Gravity and motion slow their time > > > from its fastest starting point. For energy everything is happening in > > > these two times. Two universal rates both slowdown for one clock > > > frame. > > > > Mitch Raemsch; Everything is happening in two times- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity slows time. Energy flow has a rate through space. These are > > the two times of GR gravity and SR motion time. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The two rates slow down from a maximum time speed. They come together > as a one time flow over energy for matter. Matter has two time rates > that come together and is taking place in. > > Mitch Raemsch- Have you tried a laxative?
From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 14:26 On Apr 27, 12:55 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 10:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 25, 9:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 18, 1:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 16, 9:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 16, 9:26 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:53 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 6:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 1:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 10:56 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 7:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hawking has a two time theory. I believe Einstein had one. One time is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for his motion and the other for his gravity. There are two time rates > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that slow down for matter. They can also speed back up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rate of time is location,location,location. Even here on earth time is > > > > > > > > > > > > > different on the poles than on the equator. Think about it TreBert > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean things in "time" "take place?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean time measurement is different. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > Is not time measurement dependent on moving energy of the clock parts? > > > > > > > > > > > Mitsch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Energy flowing through space with aether rate flowing over it. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > Burt, you're a two-timer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Two Aether rates that slowdown come together as one slower flow rate > > > > > > > over energy. > > > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > > > > The Aether has been discredited. So you believe it to be real?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > No one has disproven the mathemitcal flow rate of time. > > > > > > Aether flows. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > There are two slowing rates in the universe. These are slowing down > > > > from a fastest rate starting point. Gravity and motion slow their time > > > > from its fastest starting point. For energy everything is happening in > > > > these two times. Two universal rates both slowdown for one clock > > > > frame. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch; Everything is happening in two times- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Gravity slows time. Energy flow has a rate through space. These are > > > the two times of GR gravity and SR motion time. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > The two rates slow down from a maximum time speed. They come together > > as a one time flow over energy for matter. Matter has two time rates > > that come together and is taking place in. > > > Mitch Raemsch- The flow of time has a rate over energy of matter and light. Micth Raemsch
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: The first finite Next: The Doppler effect and its meaning about photon energy emission !! |