Prev: Stephen Hawking and Two Physical Times
Next: Aether is a physical substance
From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 03:55
As for me

the Doppler effect
is an immediate disprove of the
E=hf
as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!

(ps
this issue is only for cleaver honest
creative people
ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------
From: Inertial on 5 Apr 2010 03:58

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> As for me
>
> the Doppler effect
> is an immediate disprove of the
> E=hf

Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent

> as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!

Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of smaller
photons with a fixed frequencies and energy.

Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of smaller
energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy?

> (ps
> this issue is only for cleaver honest
> creative people
> ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)

So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.


From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 04:28
On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > As for me
>
> > the Doppler effect
> > is an immediate disprove of the
> > E=hf
>
> Except it doesn't.  Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent
>
> > as  the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!
>
> Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of smaller
> photons with a fixed frequencies and energy.
>
> Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of smaller
> energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy?
>
> > (ps
> > this issue is only for cleaver honest
> > creative  people
> > ie not for  crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
>
> So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.

----------------------
(:-)
and that anonymous psychopath imbecile
Inertial = ARTFUL == ???
is the example to creatures whom
i am not going to discuss with !!
2
since i don t believe in spoon feeding
can anyone
of the other readers guess
why i claim the above ??

TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------
From: Inertial on 5 Apr 2010 04:54

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ca1ebc7-4cb6-4ad0-b4d2-6882d7467442(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > As for me
>>
>> > the Doppler effect
>> > is an immediate disprove of the
>> > E=hf
>>
>> Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent
>>
>> > as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!
>>
>> Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of
>> smaller
>> photons with a fixed frequencies and energy.
>>
>> Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of
>> smaller
>> energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy?
>>
>> > (ps
>> > this issue is only for cleaver honest
>> > creative people
>> > ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
>>
>> So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.
>
> ----------------------
> (:-)
> and that anonymous psychopath imbecile
> Inertial = ARTFUL == ???
> is the example to creatures whom

That's you

> i am not going to discuss with !!

Scared eh? I have shown you wrong too many times.

> 2
> since i don t believe in spoon feeding
> can anyone
> of the other readers guess
> why i claim the above ??

What above?


From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 05:42
On Apr 5, 10:54 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6ca1ebc7-4cb6-4ad0-b4d2-6882d7467442(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
>
> >> > As for me
>
> >> > the Doppler effect
> >> > is an immediate disprove of the
> >> > E=hf
>
> >> Except it doesn't.  Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent
>
> >> > as  the definition is a single smallest photon energy !!
>
> >> Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of
> >> smaller
> >> photons with a fixed frequencies and energy.
>
> >> Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of
> >> smaller
> >> energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy?
>
> >> > (ps
> >> > this issue is only for cleaver honest
> >> > creative  people
> >> > ie not for  crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...)
>
> >> So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.
>
> > ----------------------
> > (:-)
> > and that anonymous psychopath imbecile
> > Inertial = ARTFUL  == ???
> > is the   example to  creatures whom
>
> That's you
>
> > i am not going  to discuss  with !!
>
> Scared eh?  I have shown you wrong too many times.
>
> > 2
> > since i don t believe in spoon feeding
> > can anyone
> > of the other readers guess
> > why i claim the above ??
>
> What above?

------------------------
i thought i wrote English
**i am not going to discuss with """"Inertial**
is it not clear enough??!!

next

Y.P
-------------------
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Stephen Hawking and Two Physical Times
Next: Aether is a physical substance