From: Jamie on
..p.jm.(a)see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:58:53 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat(a)yahoo.com
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Mar 24, 8:52 pm, "Grumpy" <t.se...(a)verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The Health Care debate has traversed the Orwellian plane. What Obama
>>>has proposed is a "Public Option". Notice the word "option". Nobody
>>>is going to be forced into it.
>
>
> First off, there is no 'public option' in the bill.
>
> Second, people WILL be forced into it. Not by anything so
> simple and open as a law saying 'you must buy this', but by the
> manipulation of the insurance markets, via government regulations and
> subsidies to its own program, that are going to drive the insurance
> companies out of business.
>
>
>>Thanks Grumpy! I appreciate the clarity of your response. But I've
>>read a great deal of the actual bills, and they don't matchyour
>>impressions, or the public statements made by the President and his
>>allies. That's my complaint.
>
>
> and a valid one.
>
>
>
>>>Nothing is going to change for those
>>>who love their private insurance plans, they can keep it just as it
>>>is,
>
>
> Bullshit. The government is going to totally change '
> your existing policy' by adding mandatory coverages that 'they think
> you should have' etc, the insurance companies will sit down and figure
> out that thay'll lose money on it, and either double the premium ( in
> whcih case your employer will stop offering it ), or simply stop
> offering it at all.
>
>
>>That isn't true either. I have to check the language in this (Senate)
>>bill, and see how the amendments in the reconciliation bill amended
>>it, but the House bill provided such strict limitations on keeping
>>your policy that, eventually, everyone would be forced out of their
>>current coverage.
>
>
> Exactly right.
>
>
>>I'm also not an expert on the insurance business, but the new bill
>>cuts the insurance companies to such tight margins--15%, which has to
>>cover their costs and profit--that I'm not sure they can survive.
>
>
> That's the whole idea. Ultimately, the only 'option' left
> will be NHS / 'single payer' IOW Federal Health Insurance.
>
> Here's today's pop quiz - what insurance company has the
> highest 'rejected claims' ratio in the industry ?
>
>
I wouldn't know that currently how ever, the way I see it, I most likely
would say in the future, "The Federal health Ins." if it survives!



From: Oscar_Lives on

"Gunner Asch" <gunnerasch(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ru8gq5di409fbjdd05ibe95o5o5ekrlji8(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:01:09 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
> <cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Someone want to archive this post? Check back in one year,
>>and then in two years and see if the American Worker feels
>>"stood up for".
>
> It would be interesting to see if Bob F survives the coming Great Cull.
>


Is that the coming cull sponsored by the KKK?


From: Don Ocean on
Oscar_Lives wrote:
> "Gunner Asch" <gunnerasch(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ru8gq5di409fbjdd05ibe95o5o5ekrlji8(a)4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:01:09 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
>> <cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Someone want to archive this post? Check back in one year,
>>> and then in two years and see if the American Worker feels
>>> "stood up for".
>> It would be interesting to see if Bob F survives the coming Great Cull.
>>
>
>
> Is that the coming cull sponsored by the KKK?

If it takes the KKK to get us back on track..So be it. Ummmm? Is there
still such a thing as the KKK?
>
>
From: JosephKK on
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:03:37 -0400, .p.jm.(a)see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:23:42 -0500, Jamie
><jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> Here's today's pop quiz - what insurance company has the
>>> highest 'rejected claims' ratio in the industry ?
>>>
>>>
>>I wouldn't know that currently how ever, the way I see it, I most likely
>>would say in the future, "The Federal health Ins." if it survives!
>
> Very very close.
>
> Today's answer is 'Medicare'. Higher claim rejection rate
>than any private company.

Yep. And the highest fraud losses by over double of _any_ other provider.
From: Gunner Asch on
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:11:38 -0500, "Oscar_Lives"
<Oscar_Lives(a)heaven.com> wrote:

>
>"Gunner Asch" <gunnerasch(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ru8gq5di409fbjdd05ibe95o5o5ekrlji8(a)4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:01:09 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
>> <cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Someone want to archive this post? Check back in one year,
>>>and then in two years and see if the American Worker feels
>>>"stood up for".
>>
>> It would be interesting to see if Bob F survives the coming Great Cull.
>>
>
>
>Is that the coming cull sponsored by the KKK?
>
Nope but the Great Cull will include the KKK.

Just think..you get bulldozed into the same ditch as a Klanner.

Rest in Piece, both of you.

Laugh laugh laugh


Gunner


"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost