Thank you God/Jesus
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 2 Terms
Next: Solving a Math Problem.
From: dh on 20 Apr 2010 16:24 On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:07:28 -0400, Christopher A. Lee <calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: >On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:27:16 -0400, dh@. wrote: > >>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:56:52 -0400, Christopher A. Lee >><calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:45:55 -0400, dh@. pointed out: >>> >>>> It's not hard to suggest things that people in your position >>>>can't think about realistically. Anything to do with God for >>>>example, leaves you stopped dead. >>> >>>No, liar. It is all about your stupid, rude question-begging. >> >> LOL! I'd be interested in anything you consider to be >>examples of you trying to think realistically about the >>possibility that God does exist. > >Not my problem, LOL! You can't do it, as I correctly pointed out.
From: Virgil on 20 Apr 2010 17:02 In article <k83ss514o1ujdncuhhip17j9qbl479o6k2(a)4ax.com>, dh@. wrote: > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:07:28 -0400, Christopher A. Lee > <calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: > > >On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:27:16 -0400, dh@. wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:56:52 -0400, Christopher A. Lee > >><calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:45:55 -0400, dh@. pointed out: > >>> > >>>> It's not hard to suggest things that people in your position > >>>>can't think about realistically. Anything to do with God for > >>>>example, leaves you stopped dead. > >>> > >>>No, liar. It is all about your stupid, rude question-begging. > >> > >> LOL! I'd be interested in anything you consider to be > >>examples of you trying to think realistically about the > >>possibility that God does exist. > > > >Not my problem, > > LOL! You can't do it, as I correctly pointed out. On the other hand, I cannot think realistically about the possibility that any gods do exist.
From: dh on 21 Apr 2010 15:17 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:02:12 -0600, Virgil <Virgil(a)home.esc> wrote: >In article <k83ss514o1ujdncuhhip17j9qbl479o6k2(a)4ax.com>, dh@. wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:07:28 -0400, Christopher A. Lee >> <calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:27:16 -0400, dh@. wrote: >> > >> >>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:56:52 -0400, Christopher A. Lee >> >><calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:45:55 -0400, dh@. pointed out: >> >>> >> >>>> It's not hard to suggest things that people in your position >> >>>>can't think about realistically. Anything to do with God for >> >>>>example, leaves you stopped dead. >> >>> >> >>>No, liar. It is all about your stupid, rude question-begging. >> >> >> >> LOL! I'd be interested in anything you consider to be >> >>examples of you trying to think realistically about the >> >>possibility that God does exist. >> > >> >Not my problem, >> >> LOL! You can't do it, as I correctly pointed out. > >On the other hand, I cannot think realistically about the possibility >that any gods do exist. Considering both what humans have learned to do in the past 10K years and how many galaxies there are, it's harder to believe there are no gods anywhere than it is that there are gods in some places.
From: WG on 8 May 2010 17:13
No one is born religious, it is an aquired disease |