The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier than expected
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Economics is one of the "Soft Sciences," and who'll win the "Nobel" for BP's cap&trade nostrum (circa Waxman's '91 bill) ??
Next: Climate skeptics are looking at BP's cap&trade bailout of Wall St. and "the City" -- the next & biggest!
From: michael michalchik on 25 Jul 2010 15:07 Nobody wants infinite answers that is why we do experiments and work on theories that give more specific ones. On Jul 23, 4:31 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 11:11 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list > > The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier > > than expectedhttp://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5... > > ------------------ > dont you see from heir high talking about should in a cople of yere > etc etc > THAT THEY ARE IN BIG TROUBLE ??... > > i espacially like that quote from them > (just a littel example > quote > ''giving infinite answers for the strength of particle interactions, > unless physicists fudge the numbers. > > end of quote > (:-) > dont you see the pathetic talking > > 'INFINITE ANSWERS ''' > common stupid crooks... > > WE DONT NED INFINITE ANSWERS !! > > WE NEED just A FEW GOD ONCE !!! > we like modest people !!! > > not to mention that > 'curved space' is not even in their big mouth !!! > > with big hands > > and small mouths !!! > > ATB > Y.Porat > ----------------------
From: Y.Porat on 25 Jul 2010 23:39 On Jul 25, 8:54 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > artful wrote: > > [...] > > > > > You really are paranoid and delusional .. get help. > > I think it is getting worse. ------------------- Hi mug face baboon ------------------------------
From: Y.Porat on 26 Jul 2010 00:21 On Jul 25, 8:22 pm, Robert Hi > > ----------------------------- > > > and here is th epublishing bussiness that that > > nasty hypocrite thief Paul Draper > > is dealing with: > > quote from Who is > > Houghton Mifflin is one of the largest publishers of textbooks in the > US. What's the big deal? > ------------------------ you are playing the fool ie more a fool than even you are ! every one should understand that once someone has a private interest in publishing business HE WANTS AND HAS INTEREST IN PUBLISHING!!! now what shell he publish and make big money?? in publishing old paotong stuff?? or in publishing INNOVATIONS !!! take for an example a judge in a supreme court who will have say a private jail ..... take a basketball refer y that is gambling the Lottery of basketball games etc etc etc A FUCKEN CROOK LIKE PD OR MAY BEEVEN YOU HIGGINS SHOULD ADD TO ANY OF HIS POST A DISCLAIMER LIKE THAT: TH EAUTHORE OF THAT POST HAS PART IN A SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING BUSINESS (AGAIN *** BUSINESS ** !!!) it is not an objective scientist that gets his sallary and income ONLY FROM HIS UNIVERSITY !! and in addition to that someone like PD and his 'polite' matters palyes the objective clear hands- scientist a super scientist that is teaching others science JUST FOR THE SAKE OF SCIENCE !! WHILE THAT IS NOT THE CASE if he i staking part in a private (again PRIVATE ) PUBLISHING BUSSINESS 2 if you add on it that parrot has neverin his life innovated something realy new and innovative he wil have the push to steal from others !! just follow his begaviour along years -with me he was ALWAYS interested n my posts !! if i was worthless to him he would not bother to discuss with me solongish as he did !!! why did he got my book and never let me know about it?? if my book is nonsense WHY SHOULD HE GET IT BY SOME CROOCKED WAY ??? CHEATING THAT I SENT IT TO HIM ??!! i asked him just bring evidence that i sent it to you !! and he could never show it!! not the slighterst corespondence between us about say sending me his address tosend to etc i ad to any book that i send a private personal dedication soi asked him jusr show me the dedication TO YOU on the book he never could do it !! ETC ETC in another case i prsented that F = gamma m a as F/gamma == m a and m relains constance he presented as hid insight and while i told him Hey man wahy dont you menstion my name as innovatore he answered me 'it was done 80 years ago '' soi asked him jsut bring a quote that it was done 80 years a go the 'innocent lamb' could vever bring such a quote !!! etc etc etc now once you disocover something that-- that 'innocent lamb' never bothered to mentioned that this innocent lamb has some publishing business interest EVERY THING BECOMES CLEAR !! and it seesmt that he is not alone in that BUSINESS !!! he has his cooperators (and might well be that all those ***anonymous pigs ** are he himself or business cooperators got it at last -- -- dear*** honest*** readers ???!! Y.Porat -----------------------------
From: Inertial on 26 Jul 2010 00:41 "Y.Porat" wrote in message news:2d0107c0-7bee-4821-b4cf-f794568b109a(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... [snip paranoia and idiocy] Nothng left. Really .. you're getting worse. Get some psychiatric help. You are insane.
From: Inertial on 26 Jul 2010 00:48
"Y.Porat" wrote in message news:2d0107c0-7bee-4821-b4cf-f794568b109a(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... [snip ranting] >i prsented that >F = gamma m a >as >F/gamma == m a [snip more ranting] m a is the formula for Newtonian force gamma m a is (you say*) the formula for Relativistic force F = gamma m a just says Relativistic force is gamma times the Newtonian force F/gamma = m a just says Relativistic force divided by gamma is the Newtonian force Its not saying anything new or different. It is not innovative. (*) and you've been told many many many times: F = gamma m a is NOT the formula for relativistic force anyway. But you refuse to read or learn. |