The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier than expected
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Economics is one of the "Soft Sciences," and who'll win the "Nobel" for BP's cap&trade nostrum (circa Waxman's '91 bill) ??
Next: Climate skeptics are looking at BP's cap&trade bailout of Wall St. and "the City" -- the next & biggest!
From: Igor on 22 Jul 2010 16:04 Sam Wormley wrote: > NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list > The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier > than expected > http://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5NzIyNzc5MgS2&b=2&j=NzgxMzc4MTgS1&mt=1&rt=0 Not to mention a possible fourth generation of quarks and leptons that I've been reading about lately.
From: Sam Wormley on 22 Jul 2010 16:11 On 7/22/10 3:04 PM, Igor wrote: > > > Sam Wormley wrote: >> NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list >> The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier >> than expected >> http://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5NzIyNzc5MgS2&b=2&j=NzgxMzc4MTgS1&mt=1&rt=0 > > Not to mention a possible fourth generation of quarks and leptons that > I've been reading about lately. > Where have you been reading about a fourth generation of quarks and leptons?
From: Y.Porat on 23 Jul 2010 07:31 On Jul 21, 11:11 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list > The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier > than expectedhttp://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5... ------------------ dont you see from heir high talking about should in a cople of yere etc etc THAT THEY ARE IN BIG TROUBLE ??... i espacially like that quote from them (just a littel example quote ''giving infinite answers for the strength of particle interactions, unless physicists fudge the numbers. end of quote (:-) dont you see the pathetic talking 'INFINITE ANSWERS ''' common stupid crooks... WE DONT NED INFINITE ANSWERS !! WE NEED just A FEW GOD ONCE !!! we like modest people !!! not to mention that 'curved space' is not even in their big mouth !!! with big hands and small mouths !!! ATB Y.Porat ----------------------
From: Inertial on 23 Jul 2010 07:44 "Y.Porat" wrote in message news:b654160b-055e-4857-8fd4-d2734cd2b211(a)g35g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > >On Jul 21, 11:11 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list >> The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier >> than >> expectedhttp://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5... > >------------------ >dont you see from heir high talking about should in a cople of yere >etc etc >THAT THEY ARE IN BIG TROUBLE ??... Nope ... the LHC isn't up to full power yet. It takes time [snip usual porat ranting]
From: PD on 23 Jul 2010 13:22
On Jul 23, 6:31 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 11:11 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > NATURE: Large Hadron Collider gets yet more exotic "to-do" list > > The Large Hadron Collider could throw up evidence of new physics earlier > > than expectedhttp://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=16&m=35619630&r=NTM5... > > ------------------ > dont you see from heir high talking about should in a cople of yere > etc etc > THAT THEY ARE IN BIG TROUBLE ??... Why? From the very *design* of the accelerator, long before it was built, it was known that it would take a couple years of data taking to get at some of the desired physics results. Why would running as planned be considered trouble? Where do you get the idea that an experimental facility that doesn't give you the answer you're looking for in the first week must be in trouble? > > i espacially like that quote from them > (just a littel example > quote > ''giving infinite answers for the strength of particle interactions, > unless physicists fudge the numbers. > > end of quote > (:-) > dont you see the pathetic talking > > 'INFINITE ANSWERS ''' > common stupid crooks... > > WE DONT NED INFINITE ANSWERS !! > > WE NEED just A FEW GOD ONCE !!! > we like modest people !!! > > not to mention that > 'curved space' is not even in their big mouth !!! > > with big hands > > and small mouths !!! > > ATB > Y.Porat > ---------------------- |