From: Lewis on
On 04-Mar-10 11:40, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> You, as a secular (non)authority, have no business meddling in setting
> the days or dates of religious observations.

Agreed. Leave the religious holidays to the religious.

--
Well there are certain sections of New York, Major, that I
wouldn't advise you to try to invade
From: Andrew Usher on
Lewis wrote:
> On 04-Mar-10 11:40, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > You, as a secular (non)authority, have no business meddling in setting
> > the days or dates of religious observations.
>
> Agreed. Leave the religious holidays to the religious.

How about leaving defending them to the religious? I haven't seen
anyone oppose me for religious reasons. And the only reason I proposed
it is because of the secular use of the holidays.

Andrew Usher
From: PaulJK on
John Holmes wrote:
> PaulJK wrote:
>>
>> When I lived in Toorak, Melbourne Cup Day was definitely
>> a paid state holiday.
>
> I don't think so. It has only ever been a holiday in the Melbourne area,
> not statewide. Once you are more than about 80-100 km from Melbourne,
> you find they have their own country race day or agricultural show day
> local holidays on other dates instead.

Okay, I am happy to be corrected. I never researched it when
I lived there. It was just an impression I formed at the time.
pjk

From: PaulJK on
Peter Moylan wrote:
> John Holmes wrote:
>> PaulJK wrote:
>>>
>>> When I lived in Toorak, Melbourne Cup Day was definitely
>>> a paid state holiday.
>>
>> I don't think so. It has only ever been a holiday in the Melbourne area,
>> not statewide. Once you are more than about 80-100 km from Melbourne,
>> you find they have their own country race day or agricultural show day
>> local holidays on other dates instead.
>>
> Agreed. Melbourne Cup Day has never been a holiday in NSW.

I didn't suggest that. I spent a few years living in NSW too
and I know it never was a holiday over there.
I thought it was a state holiday in VIC.
But John says it's never been even that.
pjk

From: tony cooper on
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 05:47:53 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim(a)verizon.net> wrote:

>On Mar 1, 8:35�am, tony cooper <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 04:51:09 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <gramma...(a)verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >Don't be ridiculous. Washington's Birthday is February 22 (Gregorian),
>> >> >and Presidents' Day was observed on Feburary 15.
>>
>> >> Your foot's bleeding again. Have the bullet removed before the wound
>> >> festers.
>>
>> >> Washington's Birthday was officially shifted to the third Monday in
>> >> February by the Uniform Monday Holiday Act in 1971. The federal
>> >> holiday has never officially been changed to President's Day.
>>
>> >> The change was made 39 years ago. You've never noticed?
>>
>> >In some states, we think Lincoln was pretty important, too.
>>
>> >We note that you moved to a part of the country where Lincoln is
>> >despised.
>>
>> If there's an anti-Lincoln sentiment in Florida I'm not aware of it.
>> To be honest about it - and I should be when Abe is involved - Lincoln
>> really isn't the subject of many conversations around here. �
>
>That says something right there.

>> Is your "We" an insular "We" or a Royal "We"? �For what group do you
>> speak? �New Yorkers, linguists, or generally-considered-to-be-potty
>> cross-posters?
>
>If you have so much trouble interpreting simple English, why do you
>hang around a.u.e.?
>
>The "we" are the residents of New York and Illinois.

What are we missing, then, here in Florida? Is Lincoln a daily
conversational topic in New York and down-state Illinois? I know he
isn't in Chicago because I lived there. I mean we talked about
Lincoln Park, and I lived on Lincoln Park West for a while, but we
didn't discuss Abe very often. We could go for months on end without
ever bringing Abe into the conversation. There are some people in
Springfield and New Salem who talk about Abe frequently, but they are
tour guides.

And, I am still confused about your usage of "we". "We", to me, means
more than one person and "resident of" means where you live. You are
a resident of New Jersey, but not a resident of either New York or
Illinois, so who's the "we"? Even though you once lived in Illinois,
you are not now a resident of Illinois.





--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida