The real twin paradox.
in [Relativity]
|
From: colp on 25 Nov 2007 13:14 On Nov 26, 12:28 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...(a)ThankS-NO- SperM.hotmail.com> wrote: > "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in messagenews:a1a62fff-f7c6-4b8c-8e57-ac05b3f817d4(a)e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > On Nov 25, 5:50 am, stevendaryl3...(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) > > wrote: > >> colp says... > > >> >On Nov 25, 3:57 am, stevendaryl3...(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) > >> >wrote: > >> >> If the theory of relativity is wrong, then > >> >> there are two simple ways to demonstrate that > >> >> it is wrong: (1) Show that it makes predictions > >> >> that are contradictory, or (2) Show that it makes > >> >> predictions that are proved false by experiment. > > >> >In this thread I have pursued the first option. > > >> No, you haven't. As I said, you have to look at > >> what relativity *actually* predicts, not your > >> own distorted version of relativity. > > > What do you think the difference is between my version of relativity > > and your version of relativity? > > The problem is that you are a retard, and, by definition, > nobody can help a retard understand his own condition. You are unable to show how my version of relativity misinterprets the standard theory. I'd say that someone who has been outed for misdirection but refuses to admit defeat is a retard.
From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) on 25 Nov 2007 13:18 "colp" <colp(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message news:8286a417-e3e3-4956-ae1d-132fedf34158(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com... .... > I'd say that someone who has been outed for > misdirection but refuses to admit defeat is a retard. From your own mouth too. Hoist by your own petard... And not only that, but a full record of this "conversation" has been recorded for years, for easy reference. David A. Smith
From: colp on 25 Nov 2007 18:46 On Nov 26, 7:18 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message > > news:8286a417-e3e3-4956-ae1d-132fedf34158(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com... > ... > > > I'd say that someone who has been outed for > > misdirection but refuses to admit defeat is a retard. > > From your own mouth too. > > Hoist by your own petard... Really? Dirk's misdirection is evident in his opening post, but he has not shown any misdirection on my part. Dirk's misdirects by describing the return leg in a way which is inconsistent with SR. This misdirection serves to hide the paradox. One could argue that switching reference frames half way through the experiment is another form of misdirection. He has neither admitted not denied his error, and has resorted to insults in favour of arguments.
From: Dono on 25 Nov 2007 18:50 On Nov 25, 3:46 pm, colp <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote: < > http://www.moronsalt.com/moronsalt.jpg
From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) on 25 Nov 2007 20:37
"colp" <colp(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message news:a99bf3bb-6f11-4a6a-bfbd-4c285e3b2995(a)s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 26, 7:18 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" > <dl...(a)cox.net> > wrote: >> "colp" <c...(a)solder.ath.cx> wrote in message >> >> news:8286a417-e3e3-4956-ae1d-132fedf34158(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com... >> ... >> >> > I'd say that someone who has been outed for >> > misdirection but refuses to admit defeat is a retard. >> >> From your own mouth too. >> >> Hoist by your own petard... > > Really? Really. > Dirk's misdirection is evident in his opening post, but > he has not shown any misdirection on my part. *You* certainly have shown such. .... > He has neither admitted not denied his error, and has > resorted to insults in favour of arguments. He is about the kindest person I know, and he has the most fun with those who set out to decieve. If you honestly believe he has made an error, you'd better check your facts at least twice. I assure you, he has not. It would spoil his fun. David A. Smith |