There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: PD on 17 Mar 2010 16:51 On Mar 17, 3:42 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 17, 10:09 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 16, 5:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 7:25 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Like I tell YOU all the time, PD: I don't go on any wild-goose > > > > > > > searches for anyone. > > > > > > > It's not a wild goose chase. If you had any competence with your > > > > > > newsreader at all, you'd see them laying right at your feet. If you > > > > > > claim you cannot find any stones and you're standing in a gravel pit, > > > > > > do you consider a wild-goose chase when someone suggests you look > > > > > > down? > > > > > > > > If you (or they) want to show competence on > > > > > > > science, paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts > > > > > > > which you (or they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored. > > > > > > > In other words, spoon feed you in the only way you can see it, or > > > > > > you'll ignore it. That's fine. You're a mule led to water. If you > > > > > > don't drink and you die thirsty, you've got no complaint that no one > > > > > > carried the water to your lips. > > > > > > I repeat: "If you (or they) want to show competence on science, > > > > > paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts which you (or > > > > > they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored." > > > > > Yes, I know. You're incompetent with a newsgroup reader, and so if > > > > people don't carry water to your lips, you will ignore them. > > > > PD: I don't need you nor anyone to give me water. I'm resourceful > > > enough on my own. NE > > > Apparently not. You can't seem to find anyone's original posts with > > your own resources, when everyone else can. Then you foam and bluster > > that they don't exist, or demand that they be spoonfed to you by a > > paraphrased reply to your posts. Does this sound resourceful to you? > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > ... sounds like PD is sidestepping discussing SCIENCE for the > umpteenth time. Go away, dunce! NE Um... no.
From: PD on 17 Mar 2010 16:52 On Mar 17, 3:48 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 17, 10:11 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 16, 5:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 7:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth..net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > > > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > > > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > > > > all. > > > > > > *** Pressure from *** > > > > > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > > > > > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > > > > > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > > > > > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > > > > > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > > > > > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > A broken record with the needle stuck in the groove is just a useless > > > broken record. NE > > > Just asking questions about your statements. Wind pressure is not > > proportional to the frontal surface area of the hair. Neither is > > aether pressure, according to you. Slow-moving air makes hair move. > > Fast-moving aether does not. Why not?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > PD: The Dutch used cloth covered blades on their windmills to > increase frontal area with low weight. Yes indeed. So why doesn't high-speed aether ruffle your hair, especially since you claim it can cause a plumb bob to show an incline? > You have about as much > understanding of aerodynamics as you do about CHEMISTRY. Radioactive > decay is not a chemical reaction, nor is anything you never wrote > apt to your qualifications to keep yapping on sci.physics. Go away, > dunce! NE Um.... nope. I was here first. You go away.
From: NoEinstein on 17 Mar 2010 16:52 On Mar 17, 10:15 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 5:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 4:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > flowing ether. > > > > Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your > > > hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation > > > system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't > > > move? > > > > > Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > toward the back of the plane. > > > > Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this. > > > > > NoEinstein > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > not? > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Dear PD: Studying the 'dynamics' of ether flow under various scenarios > > is what real science will be about for the next few decades. > > Then I invite you to do that for the next few decades. > > > You show > > your shallowness by referring to "with respect to the ether", as > > though ether is some fixed 3D grid system for making measurements. It > > is probable that the metal skin of airplanes will divert (but not > > totally stop) the ether flowing through the airplanes. > > Let's examine that statement for a minute. Since gravity is due to the > downward flow of aether, according to you, this must mean that if a > plane or a train or a car can slow down the flow of aether, then > objects inside it should become lighter, with less gravitational pull > on them. Do you have any experimental evidence of this happening? > > > The closest > > you manage to come to actually discussing science is to find some > > obscure aspect of my New Science > > Well, your New Science should hold together, right? It should be more > impervious to criticism than relativity, right? > > > and to question that, alone, while > > continuing to be BLIND to the totality of my disproofs of SR and GR. > > Unless and until you can show the readers even a single '+new post' by > > you, > > I've done plenty of these, thanks. Can't help it if you can't find > them. No one else seems to have that problem. > > > > > then you continue to be just a Parasite Dunce and a DRAG of > > progress in science. NE - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: If DRAGS to science progress, like you, would self-destruct, then I fully intend to be involved in understanding all about ether, its flow, density, and modes of concentration (matter). NoEinstein
From: PD on 17 Mar 2010 16:54 On Mar 17, 3:52 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 17, 10:15 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 16, 5:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 7:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 4:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > > flowing ether. > > > > > Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your > > > > hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation > > > > system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't > > > > move? > > > > > > Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > > toward the back of the plane. > > > > > Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this. > > > > > > NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Dear PD: Studying the 'dynamics' of ether flow under various scenarios > > > is what real science will be about for the next few decades. > > > Then I invite you to do that for the next few decades. > > > > You show > > > your shallowness by referring to "with respect to the ether", as > > > though ether is some fixed 3D grid system for making measurements. It > > > is probable that the metal skin of airplanes will divert (but not > > > totally stop) the ether flowing through the airplanes. > > > Let's examine that statement for a minute. Since gravity is due to the > > downward flow of aether, according to you, this must mean that if a > > plane or a train or a car can slow down the flow of aether, then > > objects inside it should become lighter, with less gravitational pull > > on them. Do you have any experimental evidence of this happening? Well, do you? > > > > The closest > > > you manage to come to actually discussing science is to find some > > > obscure aspect of my New Science > > > Well, your New Science should hold together, right? It should be more > > impervious to criticism than relativity, right? > > > > and to question that, alone, while > > > continuing to be BLIND to the totality of my disproofs of SR and GR. > > > Unless and until you can show the readers even a single '+new post' by > > > you, > > > I've done plenty of these, thanks. Can't help it if you can't find > > them. No one else seems to have that problem. > > > > then you continue to be just a Parasite Dunce and a DRAG of > > > progress in science. NE - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: If DRAGS to science progress, like you, > would self-destruct, No, sorry, you don't have that option. You can continue to simper and whine, if you like. How's that working for you? > then I fully intend to be involved in > understanding all about ether, its flow, density, and modes of > concentration (matter). NoEinstein Start with the experimental evidence on the question I asked above.
From: NoEinstein on 17 Mar 2010 16:58
On Mar 17, 11:25 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: The resistance (force) imposed by moving an object through ether is mass proportional. The same relative velocity of ether flow on an at-rest mass will impose the identical force, even if the mass is being held by some mechanical device. NoEinstein > > On Mar 17, 10:11 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 16, 5:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 7:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth..net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > > > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > > > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > > > > all. > > > > > > *** Pressure from *** > > > > > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > > > > > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > > > > > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > > > > > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > > > > > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > > > > > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > A broken record with the needle stuck in the groove is just a useless > > > broken record. NE > > > Just asking questions about your statements. Wind pressure is not > > proportional to the frontal surface area of the hair. Neither is > > aether pressure, according to you. Slow-moving air makes hair move. > > Fast-moving aether does not. Why not? > > We must differentiate between momentum and acceleration. When a body > moves with constant momentum with respect to the aether the associated > aether pressure is equally applied to every part of the nuclei which > is the matter.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |