There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:25 On Mar 9, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > Like I tell YOU all the time, PD: I don't go on any wild-goose > > > searches for anyone. > > > It's not a wild goose chase. If you had any competence with your > > newsreader at all, you'd see them laying right at your feet. If you > > claim you cannot find any stones and you're standing in a gravel pit, > > do you consider a wild-goose chase when someone suggests you look > > down? > > > > If you (or they) want to show competence on > > > science, paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts > > > which you (or they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored. > > > In other words, spoon feed you in the only way you can see it, or > > you'll ignore it. That's fine. You're a mule led to water. If you > > don't drink and you die thirsty, you've got no complaint that no one > > carried the water to your lips. > > I repeat: "If you (or they) want to show competence on science, > paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts which you (or > they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored." Yes, I know. You're incompetent with a newsgroup reader, and so if people don't carry water to your lips, you will ignore them.
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:26 On Mar 9, 4:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 8, 11:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 5, 5:07 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear mpc755: Your "mather" is both a misspelling and a > > > > misunderstanding of matter. Tell me, guy: Why is it necessary for > > > > there to be THREE states of the Universe when only TWO are required? > > > > AFAIK, there are only two states of mather, matter and aether. > > > The immaterial aether flow is for energy. It sets up its time. Proper > > time is the truth of the sameness of timerates to itself. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Dear Burt: Has anyone other than me ever told you that you are a > loony? NE - Irony meter just went into the red.
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:27 On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > masses of each. > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > not? > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after all. > *** Pressure from *** > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: mpc755 on 9 Mar 2010 20:26 On Mar 9, 6:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth..net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily.. > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > not? > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed.. > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > all. > 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer' http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the swimming pool." The 'water' still applies pressure to the 'swimmer' even though the swimmer glides forever (i.e. a void is not left in the swimmer's wake). 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum medium and the inertial motion of particles' http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion." The aether applies pressure to the particle moving through the aether, but the interaction of the particle and the aether is frictionless.
From: spudnik on 10 Mar 2010 00:05
why don't you just look it up, the practice of commercial pilots? > GET lost! NE - thus: science is about refining a hypothesis, which doesn't have to be one's own. most of "global" warming is, strictly, computerized simulacra & very selective reporting: the "hole" in the ozone is really, "the sky is glowing!" > Science is not about showing that somebody was wrong; it's about showing > what is right. Do your own work, using your own data, and derive an > analysis of your own. Then publish your result. THAT is science. --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/sample.html --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman, ICC's 3rd British invasion of Sudan! http://laroucehpub.com |