There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: mpc755 on 8 Mar 2010 17:32 On Mar 5, 5:07 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: Your "mather" is both a misspelling and a > misunderstanding of matter. Tell me, guy: Why is it necessary for > there to be THREE states of the Universe when only TWO are required? AFAIK, there are only two states of mather, matter and aether. > Ether doesn't FILL space; it flows through it like wind in weather > systems on Earth. Ether is NOT a medium required for the propagation > of light 'waves' (sic). I know that to be true because light quanta, > or photons, can travel through the Swiss Cheese voids between > galaxies. Additionally, there is no wavelike motion of the ether > associated with 'gravity', either. > > Since ether is the energy building block of everything else, I > realized that ether must be capable of TANGLING into energy densities > much greater than in the ether at large. Because ether can flow, > there must be a meniscus on the edge of the Universe, otherwise the > ether would keep flowing outward until the density gets too low to > form any matter. Having the Universe be "infinite" doesn't compute > never has and never will. That leaves open the possibility that there > are other universes out there. The main 'creation' question that is > unanswered is: How did the ether energy get there? Proposing that an > omnipotent God put the energy there leaves this question: Who created > God? Ultimately, the understanding of the Universe won't require > faith. It's fun to know that there are still things to be learned! > NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 2, 5:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 12:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> > > > > Dear mpc755: When you touch an index finger to the back of the > > > opposite hand, at atomic scales, the IOTAs (smallest energy units of > > > the ether), which are polar, oppose the polar IOTAs of the opposite > > > hand. Thought of that way, there is no "matter" in the Universe, only > > > tangles of IOTAs and free-flowing ether in the spaces between. So, it > > > would be more proper to say that "matter" (the energy tangles) is a > > > state of the ether, not the other way around. NoEinstein > > > This is the opposite definition glird proposes. glird definition of > > aether is "aether-is-the- > > continuous-form-of-the-material-outside-of-and-surrounding-atomic- > > nuclei IS matter-is-the-compressible-substance-that-fills-space". > > > This is why I am naming the material which both the aether and matter > > consist of mather. This avoids redefining already existing and > > conceptualized terms. > > > I think 'we' all have the same basic concept of what aether is. I > > think 'we' all have the same basic concept of what matter is. Instead > > of trying to modify the concept of aether to be a state of matter or > > for matter to be a state of aether it is better if we define matter > > and aether to both be states of mather. > > > We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have > > mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether > > applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > > > Meaning the pressure associated with the aether displaced by massive > > objects is gravity. > >
From: mpc755 on 8 Mar 2010 17:34 On Mar 5, 5:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 2, 6:04 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: The 'push back'-in-your-seat while the plane is taking > off and climbing to cruising altitude is due to the INERTIA of your > body resisting being made to go faster. There is ether flow causing > that 'push back'. The reason (observed) UFOs can change direction so > quickly without having the 'g' forces kill the occupants is because > UFOs control the ether envelope that must be there in order for there > to be any 'g' forces at all. > > When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, > you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether > flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be > walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. And walking > downhill going back to your seat. Clocks on the space shuttle slow > down in proportion to the total length of the flight. If acceleration > was the only cause of the slowing, space flights of any length would > cause identical slowing of the clocks, since the acceleration phases > of each would be identical. NoEinstein > The faster an object moves with constant momentum the greater the aether pressure equally applied to each and every part of every nuclei the object consists of. Atomic clocks tick based upon the aether pressure in which they exist. > > > > On Mar 2, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > glird > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > back. > > > While accelerating. Not during constant momentum. > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: mpc755 on 8 Mar 2010 17:34 On Mar 5, 5:32 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: The flowing ether applies pressure in direct proportion > to the specific gravity and porosity of the matternot equally. That > is why 'gravity' (flowing ether) causes lead to weigh more than > feathers. NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > glird > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > back. > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > Because they are moving with constant momentum and the aether applies > > equal pressure to every part of the matter. The pressure the aether > > exerts on and throughout a moving airplane is greater than an object > > at the same altitude which would be considered to be at rest with > > respect to the aether but the pressure associated with the aether > > exerted on each and every nuclei in the moving plane is equal on every > > part of the nuclei. > > > It is during acceleration that the pressure associated with the aether > > is not equal on each and every part of the nuclei and that is why you > > are pushed back in you chair on take off and move forward during > > landings. Each and every nuclei which is the human body is interacting > > with the aether. > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: mpc755 on 8 Mar 2010 17:36 On Mar 5, 5:32 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: The flowing ether applies pressure in direct proportion > to the specific gravity and porosity of the matternot equally. That > is why 'gravity' (flowing ether) causes lead to weigh more than > feathers. NoEinstein > > The pressure associated with gravity is not equally applied to every part of each and every nuclei the massive object consists of. The pressure associated with the aether displaced by massive objects is gravity.
From: mpc755 on 8 Mar 2010 17:37
On Mar 5, 5:39 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: You should make your own '+new post' if you wish to > expound new notions about science. You are clearly off the subject. > NoEinstein > This thread discusses gravity as being the 'push of flowing aether'. A better description of gravity is the pressure associated with the aether displaced by massive objects. |