There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: BURT on 8 Mar 2010 23:58 On Mar 8, 2:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 5, 5:07 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear mpc755: Your "mather" is both a misspelling and a > > misunderstanding of matter. Tell me, guy: Why is it necessary for > > there to be THREE states of the Universe when only TWO are required? > > AFAIK, there are only two states of mather, matter and aether. > > The immaterial aether flow is for energy. It sets up its time. Proper time is the truth of the sameness of timerates to itself. Mitch Raemsch
From: spudnik on 9 Mar 2010 00:07 you are referring to teh great-circle path on the God-am map; as I already stated, aircraft do not do "level" flight, in order to minimize use of feul; it's a trajectory, but it can't be symmetrical, due to drag & so forth. > DearSpudnik: A jet in level flight around the globe is traveling a > circular course. But for any given altitude of flight the ether > interferometer. All they had to do was to ask ME, and I could have thus: I haven't seen this study, but are you avoiding the issue, that M&M et al did not get null results, as proclaimed by non-et al, and Al? now, perhaps this study refutes them, or perhaps it does not -- silly & stupid, for a guy who does actual experiments. > A 2007 study sensitive to 10^(-16) relative employed two simultaneous > interferometers over a year's observation: Optical in Berlin, Germany > at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth, Australia at 31°53'S > 115°53E. An aether background could never be at rest relative to both > of them. > > http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/sample.html --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman and the ICC's 3rd British invasion of Sudan! http://laroucehpub.com
From: spudnik on 9 Mar 2010 00:12 why does a wave in the "vacuum" need anything else, to wave transversally?... there is no absolute vacuum, and their are no rocks o'light! > Spudnik: The speed of light outside of Earth's atmosphere is > unaffected by the varying density of the ether, because the tangential > velocity of the polar IOTAs (smallest energy units of the ether) is > 'c'. The IOTAs NURTURE the light on its way, not slowing light down. thus: you refer to the great-circle path on the God-am map!... as I already stated, aircraft do not do "level" flight, in order to minimize use of feul; it's a trajectory, but it can't be symmetrical, due to drag & so forth. > interferometer. All they had to do was to ask ME, and I could have thus: I haven't seen this study, but are you avoiding the issue, that M&M et al did not get null results, as proclaimed by non-et al, and Al? now, perhaps this study refutes them, or perhaps it does not -- silly & stupid, for a guy who does actual experiments. > http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/sample.html --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman and the ICC's 3rd British invasion of Sudan! http://laroucehpub.com
From: NoEinstein on 9 Mar 2010 17:21 On Mar 8, 1:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Once again, you make a reply containing not a word about science. You only purport to be qualified to tell the world what the correct processes are. Unless and until you can make a thoughtful statement about science, without implying your non- existent (un plagiarized) posts, then, you continue to be just a perennial DRAG on progress in science. NE > > On Mar 8, 2:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 10:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Tell me, guy: How is "Oh dear" a > > discussion of science? Did you forget and leave the kettle boiling? > > But NoEinstein, why would you be complaining about the absence of a > discussion of science? You've already said you don't like reading my > posts, regardless whether they're a discussion of science. You don't > seem to know what you want. You ask for something, and then when it's > given to you, you say you don't want it after all. That's a > personality disorder, right? > > > > > NoEinstein > > > > On Mar 5, 4:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 6:04 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear mpc755: The 'push back'-in-your-seat while the plane is taking > > > > off and climbing to cruising altitude is due to the INERTIA of your > > > > body resisting being made to go faster. There is ether flow causing > > > > that 'push back'. The reason (observed) UFOs can change direction so > > > > quickly without having the 'g' forces kill the occupants is because > > > > UFOs control the ether envelope that must be there in order for there > > > > to be any 'g' forces at all. > > > > > When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, > > > > you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether > > > > flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be > > > > walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. > > > > Oh dear. > > > > > And walking > > > > downhill going back to your seat. Clocks on the space shuttle slow > > > > down in proportion to the total length of the flight. If acceleration > > > > was the only cause of the slowing, space flights of any length would > > > > cause identical slowing of the clocks, since the acceleration phases > > > > of each would be identical. NoEinstein > > > > > > On Mar 2, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > back. > > > > > > While accelerating. Not during constant momentum. > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 9 Mar 2010 17:30
On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > back. > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > masses of each. > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > not? > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |