Prev: John Larkin and low jitter clocks
Next: New Search Engine for Electronic Components
From: hamilton on 30 May 2010 11:14
On 5/30/2010 5:56 AM, Bob Gerber wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 18:16:12 -0700, Winston<Winston(a)bigbrother.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Many many parts would serve the purpose IMHO.
>>
>> --Winston
>
>
> Any chance someone on the group could post an equivalent working
> circuit for this device, based upon the two published schematics
> below, and using commonly available parts?
>
> http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_13_2_dibble.pdf
>
> http://tillerfoundation.com/White%20Paper%20II.pdf
>
> Then anyone who wants to prove or disprove Dr. Tiller's claims can try
> it for themselves.
>
> To my mind, that would be a worthwhile outcome for this discussion.
>
> Bob Gerber
>

Yes, I would like to build one for my own testing.

I am still concerned that pin 1 (RDY) on the EEPROM points to a NMOS device.

So, to be consistent with the schematic, an NMOS 2864 would be needed.

If I were to use a CMOS RAM and it doesn't work, how would I know if the
RAM is the wrong part.

I might wire it up wrong. ;-)
I don't want to build this up more then once.

Testing the circuit as in,
"Initial measurements on Evian water revealed large pH excursions as the
water equilibrated with atmospheric CO2",
should be easy enough.

hamilton


From: Frank Buss on 30 May 2010 11:49
hamilton wrote:

> Yes, I would like to build one for my own testing.

But are you a "practicing meditator"? If not, it would not work :-)

--
Frank Buss, fb(a)frank-buss.de
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
From: legg on 30 May 2010 14:13
On Thu, 27 May 2010 15:25:37 -0700, Tim Wescott <tim(a)seemywebsite.now>
wrote:

>On 05/27/2010 02:54 PM, Bob Gerber wrote:
>> Can anyone please tell me exactly what this circuit is, in electronic
>> terms, and how it could possibly function as described in the linked
>> report below?
>>
>> http://tillerfoundation.com/White%20Paper%20II.pdf
>>
>> Bill Tiller is a respected scientist,
>
>Not for long, if that's what he's shilling.
>
>> but I can't figure this one out.
>
>Well, it's like this: some people in the world have money. And some
>people in the world are exceedingly gullible. And some of the people
>who are exceedingly gullible have money -- for a while. And if you cook
>up a good scam, and if you don't care much about your fellow man, then
>you can be the one that gets the money that those gullible-with-money
>people have. This converts _them_ into gullible-with-no-money people
>(which you can tell yourself was going to happen anyway), and _you_ into
>a successful con artist.
>
>I hope this helps your understanding.

If it's got a crystal and a microcontroller, what could possibly be
wrong with it?

RL
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: John Larkin and low jitter clocks
Next: New Search Engine for Electronic Components