Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me
From: Pieyed Piper on 25 Jun 2010 20:04
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:12:33 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

> but as a legacy part

Looks as if you have an improper understanding of just what 'legacy'
means.

In fact... I am certain of it.
From: Pieyed Piper on 25 Jun 2010 20:05
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:12:33 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>Legacy parts are obsolete, even if the leacy market keeps them
>commercially viable.

Somewhere in there is a metaphorical story with a tie to your Usenet
access.
From: Pieyed Piper on 25 Jun 2010 20:14
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:12:33 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>There are a few lazy and stupid engineers still designing it into new
>products, because they've never bothered to find out the more modern
>solutions,


You're an idiot to demean your fellow engineers.

List for us even one such solution, and preferably plural. Be sure to
include component counts and costs.
From: Pieyed Piper on 25 Jun 2010 20:26
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:40:43 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>
>Provided that no-one gets confused as to which set of units they ought
>to be working with at any given time.

It's a goddamned shame that your old man didn't get confused as to
which orifice to fornicate into to spawn you. Oh, that's right... he
did...
From: Greegor on 25 Jun 2010 20:58
Archie!

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me