Transformer insulateing tape?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me
From: Bill Sloman on 21 Jun 2010 13:42 On Jun 21, 7:37 pm, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:01:54 -0700, Fred Abse > > <excretatau...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:45:19 -0700,Bill Slomanwrote: > > >> That the US persists in using the obsolete imperial units is > >> definitely dorkish. > > >US customary units are NOT "Imperial". > > >Apart from there being differences, for example the pint, gallon,etc. we > >dumped the British Empire back in 1776. > > >An action that your native country is still arguing about. > > >Customary units of mass and length in the US have been defined in terms of > >metric standards since 1893 (Mendenhall Order). > > The guy is a retard and deserves no information, and the idiot rejects > it anyway. > > Rememeber the 555 timer threads? You think the 555 isn't obsolete? The information I "reject" happens to be wrong. It is a pity you lack the wit to realise this. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 13:49 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:36:43 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader <presence(a)MUNGEpanix.com> wrote: >> >> When you find a thread about winding a transformer without a bobbin, >> join *that* thread. Here, you are just gumming up the works with totally >> unrelated, utterly stupid suggestions. > >this is that thread. No, it isn't dipshit. That was the point. > None of you stroke victims even asked asked how he >wanted to wind his transformer, and that all starts with what he's going >to use as a coil form. You're an idiot. His parts were discussed early on in the thread. It is interloping retards like you that jump into a thread clueless yet thinking you have it all on the ball. Sorry, chump. You don't even come close.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 13:53 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:36:43 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader <presence(a)panix.com> wrote: >That's a very clever insult. Did you learn that from UL while develping a >black and white monitor power supply? It was an anode supply, you retarded, clueless dumbfuck.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 14:02 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:40:22 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >So what. They are still clumsy and irrational. Not at all... but you, on the other hand, are just that.
From: DrParnassus on 21 Jun 2010 14:04
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Jun 21, 7:37�pm, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> >wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:01:54 -0700, Fred Abse >> >> <excretatau...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:45:19 -0700,Bill Slomanwrote: >> >> >> That the US persists in using the obsolete imperial units is >> >> definitely dorkish. >> >> >US customary units are NOT "Imperial". >> >> >Apart from there being differences, for example the pint, gallon,etc. we >> >dumped the British Empire back in 1776. >> >> >An action that your native country is still arguing about. >> >> >Customary units of mass and length in the US have been defined in terms of >> >metric standards since 1893 (Mendenhall Order). >> >> � The guy is a retard and deserves no information, and the idiot rejects >> it anyway. >> >> � Rememeber the 555 timer threads? > >You think the 555 isn't obsolete? The information I "reject" happens >to be wrong. It is a pity you lack the wit to realise this. A perfect proof that you got tagged right on the money. |