Transformer insulateing tape?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me
From: Bill Sloman on 23 Jun 2010 03:52 On Jun 23, 1:59 am, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >- by people who haven't yet learned that there are now better ways of > >tackling the kind of job > > Who are you to say, asswipe? Somebody who has looked at using the 555 from time to time, since 1973 - two years after Signetics introduced it - and never found that it could play a useful part in solving to the various problems I was being asked to deal with. What's your own claim to expertise? Your only obvious skill is in deploying a rather restricted vocabularly of scatalogical insults. If you actually know anything about electronics, I seem to have missed the posts where you put this expertise on display. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Bill Sloman on 23 Jun 2010 04:22 On Jun 23, 2:00 am, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > > The sort of people who use it would knap > >flint points for their arrows and spears. > > As long as they were aimed to pierce the skulls of idiotic dumbfucks > like you that need removal from the gene pool. Then we round up your > spawn too. An enthusiasm for obsolete technology is a tolerably good method of getting yourself removed from the gene pool. A band of DrParnassus look-alikes dragging their knuckles, their flint-tipped spears and their flint-tipped arrow heads along on the hunt for people to eliminate from the gene pool could be expected to attract the attention of the police force long before they'd managed to edit anybody. They'd likely spend the remainder of their reproductive years isolated in prison cells, deprived of access to those people who might have been persuaded to help them propagate their own genes, and - with any luck - also deprived of access to computers that would give them acces to the Usenet. Do assemble your hunting band DrParassus. It will do more good for the gene pool than you can imagine - not that imagination is one of your strong points. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Bill Sloman on 23 Jun 2010 04:26 On Jun 23, 2:01 am, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:16:15 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >On Jun 22, 7:05 pm, Fred Abse <excretatau...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:40:22 -0700,Bill Slomanwrote: > >> >> US customary units are NOT "Imperial". > > >> > And how would you prefer to label them? > > >> United States Customary Units, which is what they are officially called. > > >"Imperial" is a lot shorter, and is close enough to meaning exactly > >the same thing for anybody except a lawyer. > > You're an idiot and a liar. They are not the same, lawyer or not. If you want to distinguis between gallons and litres, "imperial units" does the job, even if US gallons are two pints short of imperial gallons, as even an idiot like you ought o realise. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Bill Sloman on 23 Jun 2010 06:27 On Jun 23, 1:56 am, DrParnassus <DrParnas...(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:58:50 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >The rest of the world doesn't use mils > > ANY part of the world that uses inches, uses mils. > > It is a direct division of an inch. > > YOU are the idiot. Get a clue. The rest of the world doesn't use inches any more. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: DrParnassus on 23 Jun 2010 11:18
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:52:29 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >What's your own claim to expertise? Currently? Being able to spot stupid, retarded bastards that spout horseshit at every turn. |