makes no sense to me
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 19 Jun 2010 13:16 Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? http://www.ots.org/v20.php (somebody should do the math on that) John
From: hamilton on 19 Jun 2010 13:46 On 6/19/2010 11:16 AM, John Larkin wrote: > > Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? > > http://www.ots.org/v20.php > > (somebody should do the math on that) > > John > > How many of these devices would be needed to clean up this spill ? Sounds like sales to me !! hamilton
From: krw on 19 Jun 2010 14:13 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:16:58 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? > >http://www.ots.org/v20.php > >(somebody should do the math on that) Get AlwaysWrong to do it.
From: George Jefferson on 19 Jun 2010 14:55 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:8lup1693rk4of51ej5vtoj3772et0i6b6a(a)4ax.com... > > Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? > > http://www.ots.org/v20.php > > (somebody should do the math on that) > > John > I was thinking the same thing. My best guess is that it will be used on the mixture skimmed from the surface in the hardest hit places. Obviously though Costner probably has no clue and is simply trying to make some money by using his status.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 19 Jun 2010 15:03
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:13:09 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:16:58 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? >> >>http://www.ots.org/v20.php >> >>(somebody should do the math on that) > >Get AlwaysWrong to do it. 6800+ barrels a day PER MACHINE get processed to yield 2750 barrels of actual contaminant collected. That makes every barge over twice as productive. |