URGENT
in [ASM]
|
Prev: RIP relative adresses
Next: ANSWERS
From: Evenbit on 13 May 2007 23:20 On May 13, 9:44 pm, "Jim Carlock" <anonym...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: > > Use ExitProcess to terminate a program and return control to > the starting application/environment. > <a href="#ExitProcess">ExitProcess</a> > > I think HTML all the time. HTML is probably the best format > available and it offers a heck of a lot more than pdf, hlp and > other formats. I never liked the Microsoft hlp, and I think most > of the world prefers html over hlp. > Then you will probably like this little nugget I discovered while lurking in raif -- and its probably a grand fit as a hyperlinked tutorial/reference document: TiddlyWiki a reusable non-linear personal web notebook http://www.tiddlywiki.com/ This operates opposite to the traditional server-side heavy apps -- simply visiting the site means you've already download the entire application ( it is HTML, Javascript, and a little CSS ) and you can immediately start editing the contents in your browser's window. Platform-independent. Very intuitive learning curve -- simply start "playing with it" and you discover everything you need to learn about it. Great for managing data that doesn't fit in strict linear or heiriarchical layouts. Has spawned alternative versions: Getting Things Done version (GTDTiddlyWiki) {old, no longer supported} http://shared.snapgrid.com/ Student Edition (TiddlyWiki-SE) http://15black.bluedepot.com/twtests/tiddlywikise.htm ....and influenced other services: Free Hosting (online saving of edits) http://tiddlyspot.com/ News Smashup http://newshutch.com/ Nathan.
From: Betov on 14 May 2007 03:54 Herbert Kleebauer <klee(a)unibwm.de> �crivait news:46478D75.28A3C07E(a)unibwm.de: > I already told you, RPL doesn't allow me to use RosAsm. And as far > as I could see from the parts posted here, it is about using RosAsm > and not about assembly programming. Before you can use an assembler > you must know something about the language of the processor. Before > you can use a word processing program you first need to know a > language, otherwise you only can type a sequence of letters without > any meaning. So a tutorial about a text processing program (or an > assembler) doesn't make any sense when not preceded by a tutorial > about a language (CPU instruction set, exe file format, OS interface). > Now you can say, your tutorial is only for people who already know the > language of the processor. But this also doesn't make any sense. If > somebody already knows the language of the CPU, then he already has > used an assembler to learn this language an why the hell should he > then start to use RosAsm instead of the assembler he already is used > to? And if he really wants to switch to RosAsm, then he doesn't need > a beginners tutorial but a well written reference manual. Well... no comment. Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Betov on 14 May 2007 04:05 "Jim Carlock" <anonymous(a)127.0.0.1> �crivait news:4647bef7$0$15129 $4c368faf(a)roadrunner.com: > "Jim Carlock" �crivait: > > I think HTML all the time. HTML is probably the best format > available and it offers a heck of a lot more than pdf, hlp and > other formats. I never liked the Microsoft hlp, and I think most > of the world prefers html over hlp. > > When I first posted I was thinking you wanted to provide some > inline help somewhere in RosAsm, such as a tooltip text. But it > seems like you want to provide better help and more help than > just a tooltip. So think along the lines of links inside the tooltip > where one can click upon those. Or think of a right-click drop- > down menu system. > > So a right-click [...] It seems you never saw RosAsm. Right-Click multi-fonctions, integrated Help, specific items in float-menu, and so on... exist since then years, in RosAsm. Well, thanks for sharing the ideas, anyway. Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Herbert Kleebauer on 14 May 2007 04:47 Betov wrote: > Herbert Kleebauer <klee(a)unibwm.de> �crivait > > I already told you, RPL doesn't allow me to use RosAsm. And as far > > as I could see from the parts posted here, it is about using RosAsm > > and not about assembly programming. Before you can use an assembler > > you must know something about the language of the processor. Before > > you can use a word processing program you first need to know a > > language, otherwise you only can type a sequence of letters without > > any meaning. So a tutorial about a text processing program (or an > > assembler) doesn't make any sense when not preceded by a tutorial > > about a language (CPU instruction set, exe file format, OS interface). > > Now you can say, your tutorial is only for people who already know the > > language of the processor. But this also doesn't make any sense. If > > somebody already knows the language of the CPU, then he already has > > used an assembler to learn this language an why the hell should he > > then start to use RosAsm instead of the assembler he already is used > > to? And if he really wants to switch to RosAsm, then he doesn't need > > a beginners tutorial but a well written reference manual. > > Well... no comment. Now, what does this mean? Do you think it's correct what I wrote or do you think it's so wrong so it doesn't even deserve a comment?
From: Betov on 14 May 2007 05:35
Herbert Kleebauer <klee(a)unibwm.de> �crivait news:46482238.A06F974C(a)unibwm.de: > Betov wrote: >> Herbert Kleebauer <klee(a)unibwm.de> �crivait > >> > I already told you, RPL doesn't allow me to use RosAsm. And as far >> > as I could see from the parts posted here, it is about using RosAsm >> > and not about assembly programming. Before you can use an assembler >> > you must know something about the language of the processor. Before >> > you can use a word processing program you first need to know a >> > language, otherwise you only can type a sequence of letters without >> > any meaning. So a tutorial about a text processing program (or an >> > assembler) doesn't make any sense when not preceded by a tutorial >> > about a language (CPU instruction set, exe file format, OS interface). >> > Now you can say, your tutorial is only for people who already know the >> > language of the processor. But this also doesn't make any sense. If >> > somebody already knows the language of the CPU, then he already has >> > used an assembler to learn this language an why the hell should he >> > then start to use RosAsm instead of the assembler he already is used >> > to? And if he really wants to switch to RosAsm, then he doesn't need >> > a beginners tutorial but a well written reference manual. >> >> Well... no comment. > > Now, what does this mean? Do you think it's correct what I wrote > or do you think it's so wrong so it doesn't even deserve a comment? I think that you are seriously disordered, and that I have no particuliar competency in the psycho-medical activities. So, if it is not possible, for you, to put aside your usual delirium, for a couple of hours, forget it: I do not have the medication and I am sorry of it. Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |