Prev: Driving a PNP with a 555
Next: HT Relay
From: krw on 26 Dec 2009 11:28 On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:49:38 -0800, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:11:26 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:00:38 -0800, Archimedes' Lever >><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:32:10 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:47:33 -0600, "Tim Williams" >>>><tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >>>>>news:gjn9j516v8kd2on576msb18ebooicio603(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> Tim, you're talking to AlwaysWrong. You can easily tell DimBulb's >>>>>> mommy's undies, but you're never going to tell them anything. >>>>> >>>>>Don't worry, this part of the thread is fully within my troll filter. If >>>>>it's not on yours, that's your problem. ;-) >>>> >>>>I don't use filters for anything other than the most blatant spammers. >>>>OTOH, I'm fully capable of trolling the best of the trolls. The >>>>dumbest ones too, as you can easily see. >>> >>> K-Tard's way of telling the group that he trolls himself. >> >>You keep answering, AlwaysWrong. Keep it up so everyone on the planet >>knows all about the contents of your mommy's hamper. > > > Note the lack of any refutation of me remarks. You are unbelievably stupid, DumBulb. Does "AlwaysWrong" ring a bell? > You lose, K-Tard. Hadrly, AlwaysWrong.
From: D from BC on 28 Dec 2009 00:11 On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:57:17 +0000 (UTC), don(a)manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote: >In article <4gk7j5h7fsgcha5gs2gk8tb1nudavchas9(a)4ax.com>, D from BC wrote: >>On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:18:31 +0800, "Nik Rim" <querty(a)kbd.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>At the skin cancer doc the other month, overheard him telling an asian lady >>>that the main area of concern for asian complexions was melanomas on the >>>palms / soles and under the nails / beds. >>> >> >>Maybe these tissues are more prone to mutation by UV. >>Dunno.. > > Sounds to me like "acral lentiginous" malignant melanoma. > >http://www.histopathology-india.net/ALM.htm > >In the general world population, it is the least common of the 4 melanoma >types that start with dark skin lesions. > >http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000850.htm > >This one often forms on parts of the body having low sun exposure, >indicating low linkage to UV exposure. > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acral_lentiginous_melanoma > > - Don Klipstein (don(a)misty.com) Amazing that people decided to write a wiki page on acral lentiginous melanoma.
From: D from BC on 28 Dec 2009 00:13
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:53:46 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:23:23 -0800, D from BC ><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:55:19 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:36:20 -0800, D from BC >>><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:17:34 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>>> >>>>>The theory I've heard was that man was the best (long distance) runner >>>>>in the jungle and could run any other to death. If so, it would also >>>>>be difficult to eat with an ingrown nail. >>>> >>>>Maybe caveman used long toenails for running traction??. >>>>Say in sand, mud or soft earth. >>> >>>Not possible. They're too fragile. >>> >>>>Perhaps as an experiment, I'll let my toenails grow about 1" and go >>>>running on the beach to see if it's easier.. :P >>> >>>They'll likely ingrow so you won't be running anywhere. >> >>These don't look ingrown. May not be real though.. >>http://media.photobucket.com/image/toe%20nails/turquid/toenails.jpg > >May not be, but they're not broken either. > >>>Nails are simply biological leftovers that are no longer useful, much >>>like body hair. >> >>Primates have human-like finger nails. >>http://yourfingernails.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/five-differences-between-the-primate-hand-and-the-human-hand/ >> >>I get the impression that toe nails have been an annoyance for people >>for roughly 500 000 years. >>Clipping..sanding..clipping..sanding..clipping.. > >Guess why people clip them? Cause it's better than chewing them.. |