From: James Leo Ryan on
A few days ago I decided to give Unison (version 2.0.3) a try. I had
previously used Hogwasher. As I continue to use Unison I'm becoming
increasingly comfortable with its interface. What I can say is that
Unison appears to be well thoght out. Yes, it is pleasant to use! Yes,
I'm increasingly satisfied!
--
James Leo Ryan --- Austin, Texas --- taliesinsoft(a)me.com

From: gtr on
On 2010-01-28 04:28:31 -0800, James Leo Ryan <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> said:

> A few days ago I decided to give Unison (version 2.0.3) a try. I had
> previously used Hogwasher. As I continue to use Unison I'm becoming
> increasingly comfortable with its interface. What I can say is that
> Unison appears to be well thoght out. Yes, it is pleasant to use! Yes,
> I'm increasingly satisfied!

Yikes. A hogwasher user? Changing products? That's most interesting...
--
Thank you and have a nice day.

From: Mike Dee on
In article <7sde7fFociU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
James Leo Ryan <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote:

> A few days ago I decided to give Unison (version 2.0.3) a try. I had
> previously used Hogwasher. As I continue to use Unison I'm becoming
> increasingly comfortable with its interface. What I can say is that
> Unison appears to be well thoght out. Yes, it is pleasant to use! Yes,
> I'm increasingly satisfied!

Does it have useable filtering yet? By that I mean PCRE support and an
ability to filter on any header?

Thanks.

--
dee
From: James Leo Ryan on
On 2010-01-28 20:40:18 -0600, Mike Dee said:

> In article <7sde7fFociU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> James Leo Ryan <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote:
>
>> A few days ago I decided to give Unison (version 2.0.3) a try. I had
>> previously used Hogwasher. As I continue to use Unison I'm becoming
>> increasingly comfortable with its interface. What I can say is that
>> Unison appears to be well thoght out. Yes, it is pleasant to use! Yes,
>> I'm increasingly satisfied!
>
> Does it have useable filtering yet? By that I mean PCRE support and an
> ability to filter on any header?

I'm not a user of filtering so I can't really say. Perhaps others might
comment.


--
James Leo Ryan --- Austin, Texas --- taliesinsoft(a)me.com

From: Mike Dee on
In article <7sf45qF2deU3(a)mid.individual.net>,
James Leo Ryan <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote:

> On 2010-01-28 20:40:18 -0600, Mike Dee said:
[...]
> > Does it have useable filtering yet? By that I mean PCRE support and an
> > ability to filter on any header?
>
> I'm not a user of filtering so I can't really say. Perhaps others might
> comment.

Thanks for the reply. If anyone can fill in the bits, it would be much
appreciated.

Followup-To: set to comp.sys.mac.apps

--
dee