From: Mike Rosenberg on 28 Apr 2010 16:14 Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz> wrote: > Give <http://news.individual.net/> a go - only �10 per year and very > little spam. Text only groups though, but really BitTorrent is a far > better way to share files if you're into that. I've found that eternal-september.org is about an equally good of blocking spam and the price can't be beat. -- My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 28 Apr 2010 16:30 Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote: > Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz> wrote: > > > Give <http://news.individual.net/> a go - only �10 per year and very > > little spam. Text only groups though, but really BitTorrent is a far > > better way to share files if you're into that. > > I've found that eternal-september.org is about an equally good of > blocking spam and the price can't be beat. *shrug* I don't mind paying a pittance for a decent service. After all - _somebody's_ paying for every 'free' non-ad supported product and service we make use of. Even open source devs appreciate a donation. -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
From: dorayme on 28 Apr 2010 16:49 In article <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > Everybody is right. Why is this untruth in your byline? -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 28 Apr 2010 16:51 In article <280420100855588202%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > > > Are there other sources, methods to connect to Usenet? Expensive? Free? > > there are a *lot* of options, from free text only services to paid if > you want binary groups or just something more reliable than free (which > is generally pretty good but it's certainly not perfect). there's even > a usenet newsgroup for it, alt.free.newsservers. > For plain text, is there "more reliable" than the one I use? How reliable are the paid services, in what respect? -- dorayme
From: D Finnigan on 28 Apr 2010 17:16 dorayme wrote: > In article > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > >> Everybody is right. > > Why is this untruth in your byline? > Because no one is wrong. ;-) -- Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh computing. http://macgui.com/vault/
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: * Tight Teens Getting Plonked Next: Graphic Converter users, what is happening here? |