Prev: * Tight Teens Getting Plonked
Next: Graphic Converter users, what is happening here?
From: Jolly Roger on 28 Apr 2010 20:28
In article <1jhpbfn.29mnznifp7z1N%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>,
jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote:

> Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote:
>
> > Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> >
> > > Give <http://news.individual.net/> a go - only �10 per year and very
> > > little spam. Text only groups though, but really BitTorrent is a far
> > > better way to share files if you're into that.
> >
> > I've found that eternal-september.org is about an equally good of
> > blocking spam and the price can't be beat.
>
> *shrug* I don't mind paying a pittance for a decent service. After all -
> _somebody's_ paying for every 'free' non-ad supported product and
> service we make use of. Even open source devs appreciate a donation.

Same here.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Conor on 28 Apr 2010 20:48
On 28/04/2010 16:27, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Cox recently announced they won't be supporting Usenet any longer.
>
> "Note: Effective June 30, 2010, Newsgroup service will no longer be
> offered as part of the Cox High Speed Internet service."
>
> They suggest an alternative source which is fairly pricey.
> Are there other sources, methods to connect to Usenet? Expensive? Free?
>
For text only:

Free: Eternal September
Pay (10 Euros a year) Individual.net

--
Conor I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Richard Ellis on 29 Apr 2010 11:15
In article <dorayme-48C4B2.09262129042010(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article <dog_cow-1272489404(a)macgui.com>,
> dog_cow(a)macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote:
>
> > dorayme wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>,
> > > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Everybody is right.
> > >
> > > Why is this untruth in your byline?
> > >
> >
> > Because no one is wrong. ;-)
>
> Why are you replying with yet another untruth?

My apologies. You are right and no one else, in this case.
de

--
Everybody is right.
-Rochefoucault
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: * Tight Teens Getting Plonked
Next: Graphic Converter users, what is happening here?