From: Richard Ellis on 28 Apr 2010 17:48 In article <dorayme-772F86.06494929042010(a)news.albasani.net>, dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > In article > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > > > Everybody is right. > > Why is this untruth in your byline? Exactly! -- Everybody is right. -Rochefoucault
From: John McWilliams on 28 Apr 2010 19:24 dorayme wrote: > In article <280420100855588202%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> In article >> <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, >> Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: >> >>> Are there other sources, methods to connect to Usenet? Expensive? Free? >> there are a *lot* of options, from free text only services to paid if >> you want binary groups or just something more reliable than free (which >> is generally pretty good but it's certainly not perfect). there's even >> a usenet newsgroup for it, alt.free.newsservers. >> > > For plain text, is there "more reliable" than the one I use? How > reliable are the paid services, in what respect? Dunno 'bout 'more', but my provider is superb. eternal-september.org. -- John McWilliams
From: John McWilliams on 28 Apr 2010 19:25 Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Mike Rosenberg <mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote: > >> Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz> wrote: >> >>> Give <http://news.individual.net/> a go - only ยค10 per year and very >>> little spam. Text only groups though, but really BitTorrent is a far >>> better way to share files if you're into that. >> I've found that eternal-september.org is about an equally good of >> blocking spam and the price can't be beat. > > *shrug* I don't mind paying a pittance for a decent service. After all - > _somebody's_ paying for every 'free' non-ad supported product and > service we make use of. Even open source devs appreciate a donation. So, send me $20 bucks and use e-s.org..... -- john mcwilliams
From: dorayme on 28 Apr 2010 19:26 In article <dog_cow-1272489404(a)macgui.com>, dog_cow(a)macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote: > dorayme wrote: > > In article > > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, > > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > > > >> Everybody is right. > > > > Why is this untruth in your byline? > > > > Because no one is wrong. ;-) Why are you replying with yet another untruth? -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 28 Apr 2010 19:27 In article <2dellis-87F574.14485828042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > In article <dorayme-772F86.06494929042010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > In article > > <2dellis-612CAE.08274028042010(a)newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>, > > Richard Ellis <2dellis(a)notthispart.cox.net> wrote: > > > > > Everybody is right. > > > > Why is this untruth in your byline? > > Exactly! Right! <g> -- dorayme
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: * Tight Teens Getting Plonked Next: Graphic Converter users, what is happening here? |