From: Peter Ceresole on 16 Mar 2010 06:07 T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > Granted, much of the BBC's output is of good quality (production, > photography, content etc) but that's only important if the whole > subject of television viewing is important. Yes. The only thing that really counts is the programme content. Which is why I watch the Beeb more than anything else. And of that, BBC4 more than the other channels. And why I visit their News web site more than any other. Between Freeview, a PVR and the iPlayer it's pretty close to TV on demand. -- Peter
From: T i m on 16 Mar 2010 07:15 On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:57:35 +0000, peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote: >Every now and again I get a single clear note of tinnitus that comes >through the white noise. I do find that disturbing, but it's very rare >and dies down very quickly. Lasts a minute, tops- in fact it just >happened, and lasted about 15 secs. Ooo, I get that as well ... as you say as subtly different frequency and centre (often definitely in one ear). It comes in like someone's just turned on a siggy-gen and I often actually listen to it ... and it generally just sits at the same tone and volume for (as you say) maybe 15 seconds then sorta dopplers itself away? >As I said, I'm lucky. Well, only in the 'count your blessings' way I suspect. Cheers, T i m
From: Peter Ceresole on 16 Mar 2010 07:38 T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > >As I said, I'm lucky. > > Well, only in the 'count your blessings' way I suspect. Only if you are determined to see trouble; in that respect, as I said, it doesn't spoil my life, and one way and another life continues to be pretty terrific. -- Peter
From: Peter Ceresole on 16 Mar 2010 07:40 Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Between Freeview, a PVR and the iPlayer it's pretty close to TV on > demand. Which, by the way, means that I watch *less* TV, not more. -- Peter
From: Adrian Tuddenham on 16 Mar 2010 07:42
Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > > > I had one of the big 3 crt projectors here for a while but it was just > > too big to even play with in this small house. Which was a shame > > apparently because (I think I remember) that solution being less > > expensive to run from a consumables POV than any high_powered and > > expensive lamp type also about at the time (not sure what they use > > now). > > Anybody remember the original Eidophor? Huge display. Monochrome. Used a > reflecting liquid and an arc lamp. Delivered by truck... > > At the time, it was the only game in town. I was told that it caused a dispute among the unions which was the exact opposite from the usual "who does what" dispute - it was such a pig of a thing to operate that nobody wanted the job of working it. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |