From: Peter Ceresole on
T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote:

> Granted, much of the BBC's output is of good quality (production,
> photography, content etc) but that's only important if the whole
> subject of television viewing is important.

Yes. The only thing that really counts is the programme content. Which
is why I watch the Beeb more than anything else. And of that, BBC4 more
than the other channels. And why I visit their News web site more than
any other.

Between Freeview, a PVR and the iPlayer it's pretty close to TV on
demand.
--
Peter
From: T i m on
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:57:35 +0000, peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk (Peter
Ceresole) wrote:

>Every now and again I get a single clear note of tinnitus that comes
>through the white noise. I do find that disturbing, but it's very rare
>and dies down very quickly. Lasts a minute, tops- in fact it just
>happened, and lasted about 15 secs.

Ooo, I get that as well ... as you say as subtly different frequency
and centre (often definitely in one ear). It comes in like someone's
just turned on a siggy-gen and I often actually listen to it ... and
it generally just sits at the same tone and volume for (as you say)
maybe 15 seconds then sorta dopplers itself away?

>As I said, I'm lucky.

Well, only in the 'count your blessings' way I suspect.

Cheers, T i m

From: Peter Ceresole on
T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote:

> >As I said, I'm lucky.
>
> Well, only in the 'count your blessings' way I suspect.

Only if you are determined to see trouble; in that respect, as I said,
it doesn't spoil my life, and one way and another life continues to be
pretty terrific.
--
Peter
From: Peter Ceresole on
Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Between Freeview, a PVR and the iPlayer it's pretty close to TV on
> demand.

Which, by the way, means that I watch *less* TV, not more.
--
Peter
From: Adrian Tuddenham on
Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > I had one of the big 3 crt projectors here for a while but it was just
> > too big to even play with in this small house. Which was a shame
> > apparently because (I think I remember) that solution being less
> > expensive to run from a consumables POV than any high_powered and
> > expensive lamp type also about at the time (not sure what they use
> > now).
>
> Anybody remember the original Eidophor? Huge display. Monochrome. Used a
> reflecting liquid and an arc lamp. Delivered by truck...
>
> At the time, it was the only game in town.

I was told that it caused a dispute among the unions which was the exact
opposite from the usual "who does what" dispute - it was such a pig of a
thing to operate that nobody wanted the job of working it.

--
~ Adrian Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk