Virusburst
in [Spyware]
|
From: pcbutts1 on 18 Dec 2006 23:13 Not true. My program is updated daily that's why it is so large. I have also added wildcards and the read only attributes are removed before deletion. -- Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?,Fitz, Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:Xns989DEB5F18623HHI2948AJD832(a)69.28.186.121... > "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in > news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > >> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase >> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with > > As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely > from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards > yourself.. Ok? > > Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If > the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it > entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the > name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which > makes it unique.... > > >> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff >> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their >> system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS > > Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant > name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it. > >> won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already >> won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm >> sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times >> and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been >> hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be >> said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and >> stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people >> who need help. > > > I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few > observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing. > > > > > -- > Dustin Cook > Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 > web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk > email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis > Last updated: December 18th, 2006 >
From: Dustin Cook on 18 Dec 2006 23:14 "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in news:_ZKdnVq93qMS7xnYnZ2dnUVZ_u63nZ2d(a)giganews.com: > There are over 30 thousand lines of code in You must have made several additions since I've seen it... -- Dustin Cook Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis Last updated: December 18th, 2006
From: pcbutts1 on 18 Dec 2006 23:20 Also you are forgetting that Spyerase is just a tool that targets a certain type of Malware only not the whole shebang. That's why it works better for that type of spyware. -- Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?,Fitz, Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:Xns989DEB5F18623HHI2948AJD832(a)69.28.186.121... > "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in > news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > >> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase >> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with > > As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely > from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards > yourself.. Ok? > > Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If > the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it > entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the > name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which > makes it unique.... > > >> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff >> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their >> system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS > > Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant > name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it. > >> won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already >> won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm >> sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times >> and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been >> hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be >> said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and >> stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people >> who need help. > > > I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few > observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing. > > > > > -- > Dustin Cook > Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 > web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk > email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis > Last updated: December 18th, 2006 >
From: Dustin Cook on 18 Dec 2006 23:29 "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in news:PvadndU5vsVi- xrYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > >> > Wildcards? PCButts, you could put innocent files at risk doing this. You don't have any real way of knowing if the file your deleting is actually malware doing it the way you are. -- Dustin Cook Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis Last updated: December 18th, 2006
From: pcbutts1 on 19 Dec 2006 00:12
Yes I do. The Zlob variants that Spyerase targets only generates a certain pattern of various file names and only in certain directories. After adding all those file new names it is very easy to see the pattern. It is the very basics of how the signature detections work except it is more direct. It removes the files from the folders and the registry. There are a lot it removes that others miss including SAS. As much as I don't like Nick I still send him samples that I find that SAS misses. -- Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?,Fitz, Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:Xns989DEEFDA48F2HHI2948AJD832(a)69.28.186.121... > "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in > news:PvadndU5vsVi- > xrYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > >> >>> >> > > Wildcards? PCButts, you could put innocent files at risk doing this. You > don't have any real way of knowing if the file your deleting is actually > malware doing it the way you are. > > > > -- > Dustin Cook > Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 > web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk > email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis > Last updated: December 18th, 2006 > |