From: D Yuniskis on
Hi Michael,

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> D Yuniskis wrote:
>> Biscotti. Pie would be easier! :> (I don't want to end up
>> with 100 pounds of "not-quite-right" biscotti (which will
>> need to be, um, "disposed of") before I get things right! :>
>
> That sounds like a mighty flimsy excuse to me! ;-)

Actually, I'm not fond of "sweets" (despite all the baking that
I do -- biscotti coming out of the oven in 18 minutes; brownies
go in after that).

However, the biscotti in question I *will* indulge in!
(once I get the Rx correct) ;) *Then* my postage expenses
will increase dramatically :-/
From: D Yuniskis on
Hi Jim,

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:13:35 -0700, D Yuniskis
> <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nico,
>>
>> Nico Coesel wrote:
>>> D Yuniskis <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a (baking) recipe that I am trying to decipher.
>>>> <sheepish grin>
>>>>
>>>> Point in question, what's a "package of vanilla"?
>>>> I'm guessing probably ~25mL liquid volume. But, I
>>>> have no idea if vanilla is used as dried *beans*
>>>> or *extract*, etc. (nor if that 25mL is even the
>>>> right figure!)
>>>>
>>>> Could someone on the other side of the pond clarify
>>>> this? Also, if this is vanilla *extract*, is it
>>>> safe to assume it is cut with alcohol? And, if so,
>>>> what percent, by volume (obviously, getting the
>>>> right amount of flavoring is critical :> )
>>> Like others said vanilla flavoured sugar is common here. IMHO getting
>> So, is it used in lieu of vanilla extract? I.e., possibly
>> as a more subtle flavor?
>>
>>> recipes right is a matter of trial and error. If this is some kind of
>>> pie than it will probably take several times to get it right. Enough
>>> chances to experiment with the amount of vanilla.
>> Biscotti. Pie would be easier! :> (I don't want to end up
>> with 100 pounds of "not-quite-right" biscotti (which will
>> need to be, um, "disposed of") before I get things right! :>
>
> Hang loose until tomorrow. I'll ask the wife. She has bookshelves of
> Italian cookbooks.

I think most italian cookbooks are written with units of measure
already "converted". Unless it's *in* Italian -- in which case,
there might be an explanation of the *types* of ingredients
common to "most Rx's" but probably not specifics of how they
relate to "real world" units.

(most of the Italians I know measure with their fingertips :> )
From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:32:23 -0700, D Yuniskis
<not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:

>Hi Jim,
>
>Jim Thompson wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:13:35 -0700, D Yuniskis
>> <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nico,
>>>
>>> Nico Coesel wrote:
>>>> D Yuniskis <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a (baking) recipe that I am trying to decipher.
>>>>> <sheepish grin>
>>>>>
>>>>> Point in question, what's a "package of vanilla"?
>>>>> I'm guessing probably ~25mL liquid volume. But, I
>>>>> have no idea if vanilla is used as dried *beans*
>>>>> or *extract*, etc. (nor if that 25mL is even the
>>>>> right figure!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone on the other side of the pond clarify
>>>>> this? Also, if this is vanilla *extract*, is it
>>>>> safe to assume it is cut with alcohol? And, if so,
>>>>> what percent, by volume (obviously, getting the
>>>>> right amount of flavoring is critical :> )
>>>> Like others said vanilla flavoured sugar is common here. IMHO getting
>>> So, is it used in lieu of vanilla extract? I.e., possibly
>>> as a more subtle flavor?
>>>
>>>> recipes right is a matter of trial and error. If this is some kind of
>>>> pie than it will probably take several times to get it right. Enough
>>>> chances to experiment with the amount of vanilla.
>>> Biscotti. Pie would be easier! :> (I don't want to end up
>>> with 100 pounds of "not-quite-right" biscotti (which will
>>> need to be, um, "disposed of") before I get things right! :>
>>
>> Hang loose until tomorrow. I'll ask the wife. She has bookshelves of
>> Italian cookbooks.
>
>I think most italian cookbooks are written with units of measure
>already "converted". Unless it's *in* Italian -- in which case,
>there might be an explanation of the *types* of ingredients
>common to "most Rx's" but probably not specifics of how they
>relate to "real world" units.
>
>(most of the Italians I know measure with their fingertips :> )

Of course. Most recipes are really ratiometric. Tomorrow, Giada's
recipe :-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy
From: D Yuniskis on
Hi Jim,

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:32:23 -0700, D Yuniskis
> <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote:
>
>> I think most italian cookbooks are written with units of measure
>> already "converted". Unless it's *in* Italian -- in which case,
>> there might be an explanation of the *types* of ingredients
>> common to "most Rx's" but probably not specifics of how they
>> relate to "real world" units.
>>
>> (most of the Italians I know measure with their fingertips :> )
>
> Of course. Most recipes are really ratiometric. Tomorrow, Giada's
> recipe :-)

Largely so -- though flavorings tend to see lots of bias.
E.g., there is *a* shop here that makes this particular
type of biscotti. But, they are very heavy on the
vanilla flavor -- makingthem completely inedible
(IMO -- which, of course, is the only one that matters to *me*!).

It's been 30+ years since I've had any so I will be able to
tailor the flavor to what *I* think is most appropriate
(I suspect that if I were to buy some from the original
bakery "back East" I would find them less than ideal -- so
my efforts are still worthwhile).

Just the wrong time of year to be experimenting in the kitchen.
<frown> (Murphy, however, seems to always conspire to make
things so :-/ )
From: D Yuniskis on
Hi Michael,

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> Jim Thompson wrote:
>> Hang loose until tomorrow. I'll ask the wife. She has bookshelves of
>> Italian cookbooks.
>
> And a big pressure cooker? I hear that most Italians are tough and
> stringy. ;-)

Naw, you just have to cook them in a slow oven to get
them nice and juicy!