What are space and time?
in [Math]
|
Prev: andre@moorelife.nl
Next: get cancer and die, musacunt
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 23:24 On 7/18/10 7:50 AM, Huang wrote: > Time and length are the same thing. They are just dimensions. You are quite wrong. Look up the differences between space-like dimensions and time-like dimensions.
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 23:25 On 7/18/10 8:48 AM, Huang wrote: > Conservation. I can explain conservation in a way that you've > never heard before because scientists are dum. I can explain > conservation without resorting to a magic wand. > I'm not surprised.
From: Michael Gordge on 19 Jul 2010 05:26 On Jul 19, 7:53 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Yes, But you are uncertain that it did make any sense to you? MG
From: JT on 19 Jul 2010 06:32 On 18 Juli, 23:31, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:50 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 18, 5:54 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/18/10 5:22 AM, JT wrote: > > > > > No Samtimeis the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with > > > > using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to > > > > your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower > > > > then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. > > > > Not true with satellite clocks such as those used in GPS. > > > Timeand length are the same thing. > > One second, one hour, one day, one inch, ten feet and twelve miles are > all the same things? you really do need to check your premises. > > Time and length are totally different and both are totally seperate > concepts which man uses to help solve the problems of his survival, > they (time and length) each have their very own unique and seperate > identities, they are NOT the same thing, where on earth are you > getting this garbage from? > > MG > > MG No a nonevariant unit means it is possible to quantify the unit just like ****MASS****. There is no observers the mass is what it is. JT
From: jmfbahciv on 19 Jul 2010 08:11
Huang wrote: > On Jul 18, 5:54 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/18/10 5:22 AM, JT wrote: >> >> > No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with >> > using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to >> > your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower >> > then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. >> >> Not true with satellite clocks such as those used in GPS. > > > Time and length are the same thing. They are just dimensions. Our > perception is that time is somehow different but it is not. They are > the same thing. > > We can model these dimensions as existing with certainty = 1, or we > can model them as if they were existentially indeterminate. These two > approaches are equivalent. Starting with this fundamental view you can > derive many things. > [1] Relativity > [2] HUP > [3] WP-Duality > [4] A correct understanding of causality > [5] A correct understanding of continuity of spacetime > [6] An a-priori understanding of why we have such a thing as Planck > Length > [7] A correct understanding of order/disorder > [8] A better understanding of paradox and it's signifigance in physics > > So pick a topic and I'll explain why I'm right, unless you lack the > balls to hold my feet to the fire. > How do you define mass? How do you measure it with a ruler? /BAH |