What are space and time?
in [Math]
|
Prev: andre@moorelife.nl
Next: get cancer and die, musacunt
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 05:48 On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 05:58 On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > > Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > > measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). > > Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 06:05 On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: >> >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). >> >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper >> >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > JT You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 06:22 On 18 Juli, 12:05, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). > > >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > > JT > > You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? > > Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. JT
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 06:24
On 18 Juli, 12:22, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 18 Juli, 12:05, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > > > > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > > >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > > >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).. > > > >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > > >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > > >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > > > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > > > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > > > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > > > JT > > > You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? > > > Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? > > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html-Dölj citerad text - > > > - Visa citerad text - > > No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with > using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant....... Ooops >According to > your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower > then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. > > JT- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - |