What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The set of all SUBSETS that don't contain themself -> PARADISE
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.98: The Independence Operator, P(A-->B), and the Dependence Operator
From: PD on 7 Jul 2010 12:29 On Jul 7, 11:26 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 7, 12:06 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/6/10 6:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Dear Sam: Make a '+new post' stating anything that you suppose you > > > are 'up' on in physics and see how many readers you get. I am "up" on > > > the entire Universe; while you only defend the status quo which is > > > your God. NE > > > No matter what subject in physics I choose, you find some way > > not to address it. Game's up, you lose! > > Dear Sam: Getting me to go on a wild-goose-chase to read the works of > others won't ever happen. You're supposed to be a 'smart' teacher > (ha, ha, HA!). You should be able to paraphrase what you wish for me > to comment on. Unless you can do that, then it is YOU who are not > addressing things, and lose! NE Here is NoEinstein's philosophy of teaching and learning: "If you are so good a teacher, then you should be able to convince me without my having to do any work. If you can't do that, then you are no good as a teacher, and what you have to teach me is obviously wrong." Compensation mechanism for deep-seated feelings of inadequacy. "Not my fault. Never my fault. Always YOUR fault."
From: Benj on 7 Jul 2010 13:14 On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook (that they keep recommending I read). For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already been taken care of by others! So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is "insane" do you? So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And that takes some serious science to accomplish!
From: Androcles on 7 Jul 2010 13:31 "Benj" <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message news:8dea86d9-0e68-4066-beb3-6a1391409765(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook (that they keep recommending I read). For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already been taken care of by others! So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is "insane" do you? So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And that takes some serious science to accomplish! ========================================== Huh! That's nothing, I've been thrown out of some of the worst pubs in town. Groucho Marx - Wikiquote I sent the club a wire stating, "PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION. I DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT PEOPLE LIKE ME AS A MEMBER".
From: NoEinstein on 7 Jul 2010 23:29 On Jul 7, 12:29 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > In your DREAMS, PD! The only person who's inadequate, here, is you, the couch potato ex teacher. NE > > On Jul 7, 11:26 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 12:06 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/6/10 6:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > Dear Sam: Make a '+new post' stating anything that you suppose you > > > > are 'up' on in physics and see how many readers you get. I am "up" on > > > > the entire Universe; while you only defend the status quo which is > > > > your God. NE > > > > No matter what subject in physics I choose, you find some way > > > not to address it. Game's up, you lose! > > > Dear Sam: Getting me to go on a wild-goose-chase to read the works of > > others won't ever happen. You're supposed to be a 'smart' teacher > > (ha, ha, HA!). You should be able to paraphrase what you wish for me > > to comment on. Unless you can do that, then it is YOU who are not > > addressing things, and lose! NE > > Here is NoEinstein's philosophy of teaching and learning: "If you are > so good a teacher, then you should be able to convince me without my > having to do any work. If you can't do that, then you are no good as a > teacher, and what you have to teach me is obviously wrong." > > Compensation mechanism for deep-seated feelings of inadequacy. > > "Not my fault. Never my fault. Always YOUR fault."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 7 Jul 2010 23:37
On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a crackpot. NoEinstein > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > (that they keep recommending I read). > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > been taken care of by others! > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > "insane" do you? > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > that takes some serious science to accomplish! |