What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The set of all SUBSETS that don't contain themself -> PARADISE
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.98: The Independence Operator, P(A-->B), and the Dependence Operator
From: NoEinstein on 11 Jul 2010 13:30 On Jul 8, 10:59 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD the Dunce School Teacher: The only ones "needing" educations are those who can't figure things out for themselves. Going through the supposed "education mills" isn't about getting educated, it's about employing teachers and giving politicians platforms to run on. If in first grade the kids were told to start figuring things out for themselves, formal education, including college, could end after ten years, or at age 16 for most students. NoEinstein > > On Jul 7, 10:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. > > You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... > > Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected > > I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you > > five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a > > crackpot. NoEinstein > > I'm glad you're so thrilled at being unaffected by teaching. > This puts you in the same category as pumpkins, pillows, and pigs, > which are also completely unaffected by teaching. > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > > > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > > > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > > > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > > > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > > > (that they keep recommending I read). > > > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > > > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > > > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > > > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > > > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > > > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > > > been taken care of by others! > > > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > > > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > > > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > > > "insane" do you? > > > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > > > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > > > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > > > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > > > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > > > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > > > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > > > that takes some serious science to accomplish!- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 11 Jul 2010 13:33 On Jul 8, 11:04 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 7, 10:29 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 12:29 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > In your DREAMS, PD! The only person who's inadequate, here, is you, > > the couch potato ex teacher. NE > > I always find it remarkable how many people come to this newsgroup > with the loudly pronounced battle cry: > "I dare you to try to teach me this so-called physics! I'll bet you > will not succeed! You see? I'm not convinced of your so-called truths. > You have failed to change my mind, and therefore I have *won* because > I have resisted all attempts to teach me." > > Anyone who would find themselves victorious in willful ignorance is a > little mentally maladjusted. > > PD PD: ... and those who GRAVITATE to the 'misaligned', don't have a problem? Ha, ha, HA! NE
From: NoEinstein on 11 Jul 2010 13:34 On Jul 8, 4:14 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: > On Jul 8, 10:59 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 10:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > > > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. > > > You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... > > > Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected > > > I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you > > > five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a > > > crackpot. NoEinstein > > > I'm glad you're so thrilled at being unaffected by teaching. > > This puts you in the same category as pumpkins, pillows, and pigs, > > which are also completely unaffected by teaching. > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > > > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > > > > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > > > > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > > > > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > > > > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > > > > (that they keep recommending I read). > > > > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > > > > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > > > > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > > > > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > > > > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > > > > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > > > > been taken care of by others! > > > > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > > > > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > > > > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > > > > "insane" do you? > > > > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > > > > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > > > > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > > > > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > > > > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > > > > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > > > > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > > > > that takes some serious science to accomplish!- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Pimpkins and pillows -- OK. But pigs learn quickly. > > Uncle Ben- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear Uncle Ben: I was a self-taught... Big Pig! NE
From: PD on 12 Jul 2010 14:26 On Jul 11, 12:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 8, 10:59 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD the Dunce School Teacher: The only ones "needing" educations > are those who can't figure things out for themselves. Going through > the supposed "education mills" isn't about getting educated, it's > about employing teachers and giving politicians platforms to run on. > If in first grade the kids were told to start figuring things out for > themselves, formal education, including college, could end after ten > years, or at age 16 for most students. NoEinstein > Then by all means let's forget this nonsense about degrees in architecture and just let anyone do it that can figure it out for themselves. Especially the ones who say the architecture status quo is obviously garbage, principally because it is the status quo! Why, ANYONE should be allowed to design buildings, as long as they think long and hard about it and convince themselves they know what they're doing!
From: NoEinstein on 12 Jul 2010 17:38
On Jul 12, 2:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: You err Big Time when you try to generalze from me to the rest of the public "possibly" needing to be taught. Only, maybe one person in 100 million has (and uses) the analytical ability that I have. I accept the engineering aspects of architecture, but don't cling to the "status quo" in architecture beyond that. Neither do I recommend changes simply for the sake of changes. Those building have odd-ball looks, don't they. I realize how frustrating it must be for you to keep trying to belittle me and to fail. As far as science goes, I am as resistant to attack as Ronald Reagan was. That's why he was called... "the Teflon President." I'm the Teflon King of the Hill of Science! NoEinstein > > On Jul 11, 12:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 8, 10:59 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD the Dunce School Teacher: The only ones "needing" educations > > are those who can't figure things out for themselves. Going through > > the supposed "education mills" isn't about getting educated, it's > > about employing teachers and giving politicians platforms to run on. > > If in first grade the kids were told to start figuring things out for > > themselves, formal education, including college, could end after ten > > years, or at age 16 for most students. NoEinstein > > Then by all means let's forget this nonsense about degrees in > architecture and just let anyone do it that can figure it out for > themselves. Especially the ones who say the architecture status quo is > obviously garbage, principally because it is the status quo! Why, > ANYONE should be allowed to design buildings, as long as they think > long and hard about it and convince themselves they know what they're > doing! |