What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The set of all SUBSETS that don't contain themself -> PARADISE
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.98: The Independence Operator, P(A-->B), and the Dependence Operator
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jul 2010 12:42 On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too!
From: eric gisse on 2 Jul 2010 15:59 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: >> Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research >> because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, >> a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! I wonder what readers he is referring to, as this is the first time I've seen someone reply to him in awhile.
From: NoEinstein on 3 Jul 2010 20:06 On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! Dear Sam: You're a school teacher who got hired by those not understanding physics to teach from books written by those not understanding physics. Haven't you heard? "Those who CAN'T teach; those who CAN, do!" I'm a doer, Sam! NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 3 Jul 2010 20:10 On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > >> Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > >> because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > >> a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > I wonder what readers he is referring to, as this is the first time I've > seen someone reply to him in awhile. Dear Eric: Click on my post 'profile' and you will see how many readers I have. I explain my New Science, I don't encourage arguing about those truths. Are you still in Alaska? NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 5 Jul 2010 09:38
On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! Give it up, Sam. You need to get into a learning mode to reply to be. I'm the MESSENGER. If you know so much, pick any point of my science, paraphrase your counter-argument, and let me explain how Nature really works! NE |